Stinkiest Trials In America
The Illicit Smashing of Who's Who Worldwide Excecutive Club

Click for Sampling of Members - WoW!!     What a list!       Strictly Politics      Judge?      Incredible list of alleged victims Tiny sampling of Managing Directors     Cross Benjamin    Cross Springer     Direct Quote         Con THESE People?!! Million-dollar con man testifying to stay out of prison        America's Best & Brightest       Main Page       Masters and Millionaires

6842
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CR 96 1016(S-1)
4 v. : U.S. Courthouse
5 Uniondale, New York BRUCE W. GORDON, WHO'S WHO
6 WORLD WIDE REGISTRY, INC., : STERLING WHO'S WHO, INC.,
7 TARA GARBOSKI, ORAL FRANK : OSMAN, LAURA WEITZ, ANNETTE
8 HALEY, SCOTT MIChaveLSON, : STEVE RUBIN, and MARTIN
9 REFFSIN, :    TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
10 Defendants. :March 5, 1998
11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 9:20 o'clock a.m.
12
13 BEFORE:
14 HONORABLE ARTHUR D. SPATT, U.S.D.J.
15
16 APPEARANCES:
17 For the Government: ZACHARY W. CARTER United States Attorney
18 One Pierrepont Plaza Brooklyn, New York 11201
19 By: RONALD G. WHITE
CECIL SCOTT
20 Assistant U.S. Attorneys
21 For the Defendants: NORMAN TRABULUS, ESQ.
22 For Bruce W. Gordon
170 Old Country Road, Suite 600
23 Mineola, New York 11501
24 EDWARD P. JENKS, ESQ.
For Who's Who, Sterling
25 332 Willis Avenue
Mineola, New York 11501

OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6843
1
GARY SCHOER, ESQ.
2 For Tara Garboski
6800 Jericho Turnpike
3 Syosset, New York 11791
4 ALAN M. NELSON, ESQ.
For Oral Frank Osman
5 3000 Marcus Avenue
Lake Success, New York 11042
6
WINSTON LEE, ESQ.
7 For Laura Weitz
319 Broadway
8 New York, New York 10007
9 MARTIN GEDULDIG, ESQ.
For Annette Haley
10 400 South Oyster Bay Road
Hicksville, New York 11801
11
JAMES C. NEVILLE, ESQ.
12 For Scott Michavelson
225 Broadway
13 New York, New York 10007
14 THOMAS F.X. DUNN,
For Steve Rubin
15 150 Nassau Street
New York, New York 10038
16
JOHN S. WALLENSTEIN, ESQ.
17 For Martin Reffsin 215 Hilton Avenue
18 Hempstead, New York 11551
19
Court Reporter: Owen M. Wicker, RPR
20 United States District Court
Two Uniondale Avenue
21 Uniondale, New York 11553
(516) 292-6963
22
23 Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, transcript
produced by computer-assisted transcription.
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6844
1 (Case called.)
2 THE COURT: Mr. Dunn, your client is not present.
3 MR. DUNN: That's correct, Your Honor, but I
4 believe we can go forward at least with the oral argument,
5 anything before 9:30.
6 THE COURT: I wanted to take up two things. One,
7 the outstanding records that Mr. Schoer was supposed to
8 examine. Do you have any objection to going ahead with
9 that?
10 MR. DUNN: No, Your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Would your client have any
12 objection?
13 MR. DUNN: No.
14 THE COURT: We'll repeat it when he gets in.
15 MR. DUNN: That's all right.
16 MR. SCHOER: Judge, I have no further objections
17 other than the ones that were expressed last night.
18 THE COURT: Well, then, that's the ruling.
19 I'll wait until Mr. Rubin gets here because I
20 wanted to talk to you about this Judgment of Conviction of
21 Ihlenfeldt.
22 MR. DUNN: Your Honor, you can go forward with
23 that also because I really have no more questions to ask.
24 THE COURT: I think we better wait.
25 MS. SCOTT: Your Honor, just for clarity sake, I
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6845
1 just wanted to make clear that Your Honor has just ruled
2 that list of exhibits is admissible, except those ones
3 Your Honor specifically excluded.
4 THE COURT: The checks and everything like that.

5 MS. SCOTT: We have not provided you about law
6 about the commercial paper. We will try to do it over the
7 weekend. We haven't had a chance last night.
8 THE COURT: Try.
9 MS. SCOTT: Also, Government's Exhibit 15-D which
10 is one of the exhibits I offered in this group had been
11 admitted earlier. It's an order form but I had misnamed
12 it, either Government's Exhibit 15-B or 15-C. So just for
13 the sake of clarity.
14 THE COURT: Mr. Dunn, do you want to go into this
15 without your client?
16 MR. DUNN: That's fine. Mr. Rubin is coming in
17 now.
18 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, the 17-D subpoena Your
19 Honor signed is an order on the second page and unless it
20 is not signed the marshal will not serve it.
21 THE COURT: I'm sorry, I didn't see it on the
22 second page.
23 MR. TRABULUS: That's all right. It's on the
24 top.

25 MR. NEVILLE: Your Honor, might I ask a quick
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6846
1 question regarding my client's request to absent himself
2 this Monday from the trial. Would Your Honor consider
3 instructing the jury in some form or fashion?
4 THE COURT: Sure, if you want me to. You compose
5 an instruction and I will give it to the jury. Make it
6 very beneficial to you.
7 MR. NEVILLE: Thank you very much, Your Honor.
8 THE COURT: I see Mr. Rubin is here.
9 MR. DUNN: Yes, Your Honor.
10 THE COURT: Did you tell Mr. Rubin about what has
11 gone on up to now, that Mr. Schoer had no objection to the
12 other document?
13 MR. DUNN: Yes, Your Honor.
14 THE COURT: And is he satisfied with us having
15 proceeded with that in his absence?
16 MR. DUNN: Yes, Your Honor.
17 THE COURT: With regard to the Judgment of
18 Conviction of Rolf Eric Ihlenfeldt, he's the witness on
19 the stand, the Judgment of Conviction which is dated
20 August 23, 1996, provides for 13 months incarceration and
21 says the following, including the following. He's put on
22 supervised release for three years and "the defendant is
23 to pay to the United States Attorney's Office, 225 Cadman
24 Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, the sum of $10,000
25 in monthly installments of 10 percent of his gross monthly
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6847
1 income during the three years he is on supervised
2 release. The U.S. Attorney's Office shall make a pro rata
3 distribution to the victims, if found."
4 And under a separate sheet in the judgment
5 entitled "restitution," it says the same thing. So
6 apparently from that I deduct that instead of paying it in
7 m onthly installments he paid it in one time. He said he
8 borrowed it or his father-in-law gave it to him.
9 MR. JENKS: I'll move on, Your Honor. It speaks
10 for itself.
11 THE COURT: Right.
12 All right. Let's bring in the jury.
13 MS. SCOTT: Your Honor, I just want to clarify
14 about Government's Exhibit 15-D. That's an order form. I
15 had previously asked for it to be admitted but I had given
16 it the wrong exhibit number. I think I called it 15-B or
17 15-C and that I did with Wendi Springer. So it was
18 previously admitted into evidence under the wrong name and
19 I want to clarify for the record that the office form is
20 actually 15-D, as in Daniel.
21 Thank you.
22 THE COURT: Very well.
23 There's a request by a jury to leave at 4 o'clock
24 on March 18th. What a pessimistic approach that is. But
25 of course this juror is a shop steward and has a meeting
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6848
1 and I'll let the juror leave at 4 o'clock at March 18th.
2 THE COURT: Where is the witness?
3 MS. SCOTT: Right here.
4 (Jury enters.)
5 THE COURT: Good morning, members of the jury.
6 Please be seated.
7 Again, I must compliment you. You are getting
8 better as time goes on. I timed your arrival, at least
9 when I heard about it, at 9:18 this morning. That's a new
10 world record. We have now exceeded the Olympic record and
11 now you're on the World record.
12 Also, I have a request from a juror and I
13 hesitate to say that we look so far ahead but perhaps it
14 is wise that the jury leave at 4 o'clock on Wednesday,
15 March 18th. I will excuse the jury on Wednesday, March
16 18th, at 4 o'clock.
17 You may proceed.
18 (Continued.)
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6849
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 R O L F I H L E N F E L D T , having been previously
2 sworn by the Clerk of the Court, was examined and
3 testified as follows:
4 CROSS-EXAMINATION.
5 BY MR. JENKS:
6 Q Mr. Ihlenfeldt, yesterday when Ms. Scott questioned
7 you on direct examination she had asked you a question
8 about your application about your current employer. Do
9 you recall that?
10 A Yes.
11 Q And you had indicated there was an optional section
12 on that application as to whether or not you would inform
13 the employer of your prior criminal history?
14 A Yes.
15 Q And you chose not to exercise that option and write
16 it down; am I correct?
17 A Correct.
18 Q Did the employer question you ab out leaving that
19 section blank?
20 A No.
21 Q Now, you are on supervised release as of August 23,
22 1996; am I right?
23 A I'm not sure of the exact day. I think it would have
24 been August 28th.
25 Q The day you were sentenced before Judge Spatt,
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6850
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 correct?
2 A Oh, was I on supervised release?
3 Q Yes. Were you placed on supervised release for three
4 years before Judge Spatt?
5 A Yes.
6 Q The day is not important.
7 In August of 1996 you were placed on supervised
8 release, correct?
9 A Uhm, I don't know if that is the day. I was
10 sentenced that day.
11 Q After you completed your sentence, your term of
12 supervised release began, right?
13 A Yes.
14 Q So it actually began once you were done, finished

15 with the halfway house in June of 1997?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And your supervised release ends in the year 2000?
18 A Yes.
19 Q So we clear this up, the restitution that you were
20 ordered to pay by Judge Spatt was $10,000, correct?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And you paid that in a lump sum from your
23 father-in-law after you were released from the halfway
24 house?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6851
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 Q And you had no other financial obligations from the
2 Court to pay any further restitution; am I right?
3 A No.
4 Q All right.
5 Now, the supervised release you report in
6 Hempstead, you said?
7 A Yes.
8 Q That's where the supervised release probation
9 officers are located, correct?
10 A Yes.
11 Q On Clinton Street in Hempstead?
12 A Yes .
13 Q Now, is it not a term and condition of your
14 supervised release that you notify your employer of the
15 fact that you're on supervised release?
16 A No.
17 Q Did you have to make any special arrangements with
18 your supervised release officer not to notify your
19 employer?
20 A No.
21 Q Did you read the terms and conditions of your
22 supervised release?
23 A Uhm, I believe I did.
24 Q Is there a term and condition which says that you
25 have to notify your employer of your status while on
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6852
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 supervised release?
2 A I don't believe so.
3 Q Okay.
4 Now, when Mr. Schoer was questioning you
5 yesterday, you said it took you approximately three weeks
6 while you were at Pacific Consultants to learn the entire
7 scam o f Pacific Consultants. About three weeks?
8 A About three weeks to understand the business, yes.
9 Q To understand the business.
10 And while you were at Costa Consultants it said
11 it took you approximately three weeks or so that these
12 people were not going to get loans; am I right?
13 A It took about three weeks before we started getting
14 denials from the first lender and we had hoped to still
15 get loans from other lenders, but we knew at that point
16 that the first lender denied every loan application we put
17 in.
18 Q It took you about three weeks to learn that from
19 Mr. Donahue?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Did you personally ever deal with Mr. Donahue or John
22 Beatrice?
23 A I may have had conversations with him. But John
24 Beatrice actually submitted the applications and paid the
25 fee.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT R EPORTER
6853
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 Q He was the -- Beatrice was the contact with Donahue,
2 correct?
3 A Yes.
4 Q Do you know for a fact whether or not Beatrice paid
5 money to Donahue to issue rejection letters or denial
6 letters?
7 A I would say that --
8 Q Well, do you know for a fact, I asked you. Yes or
9 no?
10 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
11 THE COURT: Hold it a minute, Mr. Jenks.
12 BY MR. JENKS:
13 Q Do you know for a fact whether or not Beatrice paid
14 money to Donahue to issue rejection letters?
15 A I don't know for a fact.
16 Q All right.
17 At these other places it took you like three or
18 four weeks, three weeks at Pacific Consultants to learn
19 the scam of the business and at Costa Consultants three
20 weeks to realize that a person wasn't going to get a
21 legitimate lo an?
22 A From the first lender, yes.
23 Q From the first lender, okay.
24 But when you went to Sterling Who's Who, you were
25 there about what, a week, week and-a-half?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6854
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 A Yes.
2 Q How many full days did you work there?
3 A I'm not really sure.
4 Q About a week and-a-half?
5 A About a week and-a-half.
6 Q So seven or eight days, business days?
7 A Yes.
8 Q And yet in those seven or eight business days you
9 were able to determine that it was a script of lies and it
10 had no value to the customer. In seven or eight days you
11 were able to figure that out about this company?
12 A Based on my experience in the fact.
13 Q But in seven or eight dates you were able to figure
14 it out at this place.
15 You didn't develop a script at S terling Who's
16 Who, did you?
17 A No.
18 Q You didn't develop the registry, did you?
19 A No.
20 Q You didn't develop the benefits package to the
21 members of the CD ROM?
22 A No.
23 Q You didn't develop anything at Sterling Who's Who?
24 A No.
25 Q You weren't privy to any inside information from the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6855
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 front office from people like Debra Benjamin or Liz
2 Sautter, were you?
3 A No.
4 Q But yet it's your testimony it took you three weeks
5 at Pacific Consultants to figure out there was a scam
6 going on, but at Sterling Who's Who it took you just a
7 week and-a-half, correct?
8 A Based on my past experience, yes.
9 Q You also said you didn't want to sell any memberships
10 to anyone while you were at Sterling Who's Who, correct?
11 A Right.
12 Q And was that the instruction of Inspector Biegelman
13 not to sell any memberships?
14 A I don't believe it was.
15 Q Are you saying when you went in there Biegelman said
16 if you have to sell a membership to a customer, sell a
17 membership, although you were undercover and
18 investigating the organization?
19 A I don't recall those statements being made.
20 Q Were you prohibited by Biegelman from selling
21 memberships?
22 A I don't recall being prohibited.
23 Q Now, you said you didn't want to take peoples' credit
24 card numbers, correct?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6856
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Jenks

1 Q Although you had the opportunity to take several
2 credit card numbers, right?
3 A I believe I had the opportunity to take two.
4 Q At least two or more?
5 A I would think two.
6 Q How many customers did you speak to then?
7 A Maybe 20 or 30.
8 Q 20 or 30 calls a day?
9 A Yes. I make that many calls. I left a lot of
10 messages, so I don't know exactly the number of people I
11 actually spoke to.
12 Q So all total maybe you spoke to 100, 150 people while
13 you were there?
14 A Yes.
15 Q And you didn't sell one membership, correct?
16 A No.
17 Q And then they fired you?
18 A Yes.
19 Q Because you weren't producing any sales?
20 A That was the reason they gave me, yes.
21 Q Were there people that were qualified that you spoke
22 to to become members of the Registry?
23 A I don't know.
24 Q Now, you didn't sell any memberships but you thought
25 it was okay to take some cards and printed materials from
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

6857
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 Sterling Who's Who?
2 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
3 Q Well, those terms, those cards and those materials,
4 they didn't belong to you, did they?
5 A No.
6 Q They belonged to the corporation?
7 A Yes.
8 Q Did you tell Inspector Biegelman that you were going
9 to take those materials prior to taking them?
10 A I don't recall if I did or not.
11 Q But you did take them, correct?
12 A Yes.
13 Q All right.
14 MR. JENKS: I have nothing further, Your Honor.
15 CROSS-EXAMINATION
16 BY MR. TRABULUS:
17 Q Mr. Ihlenfeldt, Ms. Scott asked you whether or not it
18 made any difference, your criminal record, as to what was
19 on the tapes?
20 A Yes.
21 Q And I think the tapes are the tapes, whatever your
22 criminal record?
23 A Yes.
24 Q Did you have an y discussions with Inspector Biegelman
25 as to why it was -- withdrawn.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6858
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 How much time did you spend making the telephone
2 calls into Who's Who Worldwide and Sterling posing as a
3 customer? How many hours do you think that would be?
4 A Total, maybe five or six hours. Total.
5 Q Did you have any discussions with Inspector Biegelman
6 as to why he wanted you to do that as opposed to having a
7 postal inspector do it?
8 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
9 THE COURT: Overruled.
10 A No.
11 Q Did you ever ask him why he would want to have a
12 felon convicted of telemarketing fraud testifying about
13 that rather than a law enforcement official?
14 A No.
15 Q Did he ever indicate to you that he wanted to have
16 somebody up there who was guilty of telemarketi ng fraud to
17 create an aura in this case? Did he ever say anything
18 like that to you?
19 A No.
20 Q Now, yesterday you told Ms. Scott that you agreed to
21 pay $300,000 as restitution. Do you recall saying that?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And in fact, the specific question to you was, page
24 6,800, line 16.
25 "Question: What amount did you agree to pay as
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6859
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 restitution of your crimes?
2 "Answer: $300,000."
3 Now, after that, of course, you were sentenced
4 and the Judge for reasons that we didn't go into, may have
5 decided that you only, as part of your sentence, are going
6 to be required to pay $10,000 restitution; is that
7 correct?
8 A Yes.
9 Q But do you regard yourself as still having an
10 outstanding agreement to which you wer e a party to pay the
11 remaining $290,000?
12 A No.
13 Q So you didn't agree to pay $300,000 at all, right?
14 A That's what the statement says.
15 Q Well, you say there was an agreement between you and
16 the government that you would pay 300,000 in restitution?
17 A That's what the statement says.
18 Q Didn't that just say that you might get up to
19 300,000, not that you necessarily would be obligated to
20 pay it?
21 A I don't know.
22 Q Can I have the statement you were referring to? I
23 think that is 24-B.
24 (Handing.) Is this where you agree to pay
25 restitution?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6860
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 I'm showing you 3500 24-D. Do you recognize that
2 as your cooperation agreement?
3 A Yes.
4 Q And is there anything in there were it says that you

5 agree to pay 315, I'll point you to a reference where it
6 says 315,000.
7 You are not agreeing to pay that, right?
8 A I don't know.
9 Q Take a look.
10 Well, do you have any kind of written agreement
11 with the government that you will be paying the remaining
12 $290,000?
13 A No.
14 Q Has anyone from the government ever told you that you
15 are disobeying any agreement they had with you if you are
16 not paying more than the 10,000?
17 A No.
18 Q So there really was no agreement to pay 300,000, is
19 that correct, it was just a possibility to you that held
20 out to you that you might pay that, right?
21 A I'm not sure.
22 Q Now, I think you testified yesterday that your
23 company, Costa Consultants, paid Mr. Donahue a piece of
24 each of the $249 you took in, right?
25 A It wasn't my company. It was a company that I


OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6861
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 managed.
2 Q The company that you managed, right, the one that was
3 Beatrices' company but you managed?
4 A Yes.
5 Q I stand corrected.
6 You paid a piece of each of the $249 to
7 Mr. Donahue until he was out of the picture and someone
8 else came in?
9 A Yes.
10 Q Do you know how big that piece was?
11 A I believe it was somewhere in the range of $9 per
12 application.
13 Q $9.
14 And that was the fee -- the $9 was for him to
15 process a loan application; is that correct?
16 A Yes.
17 Q He was going to have to get a TRW report or something
18 like that?
19 A I don't know how he would process loans.
20 Q He would independently verify the information to see
21 whether or not he wanted to loan the money to these

22 persons?
23 A I don't know how he would process the loans.
24 Q This was all going to be for $9?
25 A That's what he was going to charge.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6862
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 Q Was this a man who worked for minimum wage?
2 A I don't know.
3 Q Isn't it a fact, sir, you were paying him $9 so that
4 there would be a letter down the road that would say
5 "denied" as a cover?
6 A No.
7 Q Are you saying, sir, that you were the victim of
8 Mr. Donahue's fraud on you?
9 A I would think that the company was.
10 Q In fact -- I'm sorry, excuse me.
11 Not your company, the one you managed, the one
12 that you took three weeks to find out was a fraud, you
13 were saying that company, its service, was a victim of
14 this Mr. Donahue, right?
15 A Could you repeat the question?

16 Q You are saying that the company that you managed,
17 Costa Consultants was a victim of Mr. Donahue, correct?
18 A Uhm, Mr. Donahue promised to provide loans and did
19 not, so I would assume that, yes, we were taken by
20 Mr. Donahue.
21 Q As part of your cooperation you were hoping to do,
22 give the government as much substantial assistance as
23 possible because the more you gave the more it might inure
24 to your benefit?
25 A That was the verbiage in the cooperation agreement
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6863
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 that I was to give substantial information.
2 Q Did you understand the more assistance that you gave,
3 the better it would be for you, right?
4 A Yes.
5 Q And did you offer to the government to provide
6 substantial assistance in a prosecution of Mr. Donahue for
7 defrauding Costa Consultants?
8 A No.
9 Q Did they suggest to you that you do so?
10 A No.
11 Q Now, let me see if I understand this correctly
12 because I'm a little confused here.
13 Is it your testimony that up until the point that
14 you learned that Costa Consultants was defrauded by
15 Mr. Donahue who took this $9 for each loan deliberation,
16 up until that point in time you really thought there was
17 absolutely nothing wrong at all with what Costa
18 Consultants was doing?
19 A Yes, I did think there was something wrong with it.
20 Q And what was that, sir?
21 A The fact that we were telling people that we were
22 going to a credit manager to approve their loan or get
23 them pre-approved and they were not.
24 Q That was the whole thing. That was the only thing
25 that was wrong, right?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT R EPORTER
6864
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 A Yes.
2 Q You were just putting a little window dressing what
3 otherwise was a totally legitimate business operation,
4 right, and that's what you thought was wrong?
5 A We had hoped --
6 Q Yes, sir?
7 A I can't answer with a yes or no.
8 Q Isn't it a fact, sir, at the very most you were
9 promising people loans; is that correct?
10 A Yes.
11 Q And you were taking their money, you've conceived
12 that?
13 A Yes, the company was receiving money.
14 Q And at the very most you had a wing and a prayer that
15 they would get a loan, at the most?
16 A In hindsight, yes.
17 Q And that's what was wrong with it, right?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And you knew that and you even started Costa
20 Consultants with Mr. Beatrice, correct?
21 A No.
22 Q You didn't know that.

23 Isn't it true that you knew when you started the
24 business that it was not legitimate?
25 A No.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6865
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 Q That's not true?
2 A I don't believe so.
3 Q Okay.
4 Well, do you recall being asked these questions
5 and giving these answers in front of Judge Spatt back on
6 March 11, 1994, in the testimony that you gave in the
7 hearing for this gentleman by the name of Brian Studley.
8 MR. TRABULUS: And we're beginning with page 50,
9 line 23.
10 "Question: Was John Beatrice an individual who
11 worked for Pacific Consultants?
12 "Answer: Yes.
13 "Question: And the two of you started this
14 business?
15 "Answer: Yes."
16 MS. SCOTT: What page?
17 MR. TRABULUS: 50, referring to Costa.
18 "Answer: Yes.
19 "Question: A nd this business was, you knew when
20 you started this business that it was not legitimate; is
21 that correct?
22 "Answer: Yes."
23 Do you recall being asked those questions and
24 giving those answers, sir?
25 A I don't recall those questions.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6866
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 Q But just yesterday you were put through those same
2 questions, among others. Do you recall that?
3 A I recall some questions yesterday.
4 Q Do you recall yesterday that Mr. Schoer read to you
5 the same portion of that transcript and then read a little
6 more when Mr. White asked him to do so and then you said
7 you recalled it?
8 A Yes. If you read the following question I suppose it
9 would clarify things.
10 Q Do you need to read the following question to recall
11 it?
12 A Excuse me?

13 Q Do you need to hear the following question in order
14 to recall it?
15 A I don't know what you mean.
16 Q Now, when you -- let me say this. You gave
17 Mr. Biegelman some cards; is that correct?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And did he specifically ask you to give him those
20 cards?
21 A I don't recall if he did or didn't.
22 Q Those cards, those were cards of your choosing; is
23 that correct -- I'll withdraw the question.
24 Were they just cards given to you to call?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6867
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 Q Were they only NG cards, do you know?
2 A I believe so.
3 Q Now, did you believe those cards had any value to the
4 business?
5 A Uhm, I did not believe that they had any value to the
6 business.
7 Q So you understood that those cards were not being

8 used for the prospect of actually getting any money for
9 income for the business, but just for practice, is that
10 fair to say, for training purposes?
11 A I don't know.
12 Q Well, if they were going to have the potential for
13 getting new members, they would have value to the
14 business?
15 A As a salesperson I wouldn't think they do. Because
16 of NG written on it the numerous amount of times.
17 Q Fair enough.
18 Also, of course, those cards didn't come directly
19 from Sterling to the government, did they? They came
20 through you, is that fair to say?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And you had an opportunity to write whatever you
23 wanted on them, is that fair to say?
24 A Yes.
25 Q And you -- while you were at Sterling you had a body
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6868
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 wire, right?
2 A Yes.
3 Q And you were recording what you were doing?
4 A Yes.
5 Q Do you know if you recorded yourself when you said
6 you left messages for this person who put in that bad
7 taste card?
8 A I don't know if I did or didn't.
9 Q Do you know whether you recorded yourself when you
10 turned down these people who were going to give you credit
11 cards? Do you know that?
12 A I don't know if I did or didn't.
13 Q Now, I think you told Ms. Scott and you confirmed to
14 Mrs. Jenks -- Mr. Jenks --
15 MR. TRABULUS: Mr. Jenks, unusual slip. I'm sure
16 you won't be offended.
17 MR. JENKS: It's all right. No offense taken,
18 Mr. Trabulus.
19 BY MR. TRABULUS:
20 Q You told Mr. Jenks he had concluded after the week
21 and-a-half you were there there was a script of lies and
22 it had no value, is that right, at Sterli ng?
23 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
24 Q Well, I think you used the word, you told Ms. Scott
25 yesterday that you didn't want to sell something to people
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6869
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 that had no value using a script of lies, is that a
2 summary of something that you told to Ms. Scott?
3 A Probably a summary.
4 Q Something like that.
5 And I think you mentioned, you learned, it took
6 you about a week and-a-half to figure that out or during
7 that week and-a-half you were able to figure that out,
8 right?
9 A Yes, based on my experience.
10 Q And your experience included the previous work that
11 you had had at the company you yourself managed where it
12 took you three weeks to figure that out, right?
13 A Yes.
14 Q In terms of this script of yours, one of the t hings
15 you mentioned in the script was the CD ROM?
16 A One of the things were in the script.
17 Q One of the things you would talk to customers about?
18 A Yes.
19 Q You had never seen the CD ROM?
20 A No.
21 Q Never had tried to?
22 A No.
23 Q You had no reason to believe it didn't exist; is that
24 correct?
25 A Correct.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6870
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 Q Had you ever seen the Tribute magazine?
2 A Yes, I did.
3 Q And did you have any reason to believe anything in it
4 was not true?
5 A No.
6 Q You saw various advertisements in Tribute magazine
7 for different member benefits; is that correct?
8 A I'm not that familiar with the content.
9 Q Well, I don't want to go through the whole thing
10 again because we've heard them so many times t hat you're
11 probably sick of it.
12 There was a discount to Airborne Express?
13 A I recall that being in the script.
14 Q Do you have any reason it wasn't granted, given to
15 members?
16 A No.
17 Q Do you have any reason to believe it was of no value?
18 A No.
19 Q How about the other discounts, phone discounts,
20 automobile insurance discounts, I'll not list them all.
21 Do you have any reason to believe that any of the
22 things that were being offered were in fact provided?
23 A No.
24 Q Do you have any reason to believe that they weren't
25 of value?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6871
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 A No.
2 Q You had seen the directory, right?
3 A Uhm, I think I did see a directory.
4 Q So you knew people were given a directory; is that
5 right?
6 A No.
7 Q You didn't know that?
8 A I didn't know that.
9 Q But you have no reason to believe that they weren't
10 given a directory, did you?
11 A No.
12 Q Now, this is something that you came up on your own
13 decision that this was of no value, right? That was --
14 Mr. Biegelman didn't tell you that, did he?
15 Yes or no, sir? Did Biegelman tell you that this
16 was of no value?
17 A I don't recall him saying that.
18 Q So as best you can recall, this was your own
19 conclusion; is that correct?
20 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
21 Q And you made a decision, you were telling people
22 about benefits and so forth and these were things that as
23 far as you knew you had no reason to believe weren't being
24 given or weren't of value and you took it upon yourself to
25 make a decision that they shouldn't get them; is that


OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6872
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 correct?
2 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
3 Q Now, when you first went to work at Sterling in an
4 undercover capacity, did you discuss with Mr. Biegelman
5 how long you would be working there?
6 A No.
7 Q And did he tell you that he only wanted you to work
8 there a week or a week and-a-half?
9 A No.
10 Q To the contrary he wanted you to work there as long
11 as possible and get as much as possible; is that fair to
12 say?
13 A I don't recall those conversations taking place.
14 Q Did he tell you he wanted you in there, in and out of
15 there quickly?
16 A I don't recall that being in the conversation we have
17 had.
18 Q Now, you knew when you were there, based on your
19 experience, I assume, if you didn't make sales you weren 't
20 going to last; is that fair to say?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And you, of course, when you were working there, you
23 had to work full-time there, right?
24 A Yes.
25 Q And that wasn't like when you were making the phone
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6873
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 calls later on which you could do from the place you had
2 employment; is that correct?
3 A Yes.
4 Q When you were making the phone calls you were at the
5 same time pulling in a salary, right?
6 A Yes.
7 Q And the fact that you were making the phone calls
8 didn't take away from your salary, right?
9 A Yes.
10 Q When you went to Sterling, sir, every day you spent
11 there was a day you weren't earning any money, right?
12 A Yes.
13 Q You needed money, right?
14 A Yes.
15 Q Isn't it a fact, sir, th at Inspector Biegelman told
16 you that basically what you were to do was to follow the
17 script that was being given to you, follow the
18 instructions of your supervisors and if a customer wanted
19 a purchase, make the purchase. Let them purchase it.
20 Isn't that true, sir?
21 A I don't recall that being the conditions of my
22 cooperation.
23 Q Now, you say, you took $249 repeatedly from people
24 giving them absolutely nothing, right? This was when you
25 were working at Pacific and Costa.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6874
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 A Yes, the company did.
2 Q Well, you knew about it and you were managing one of
3 the companies, right?
4 A Yes.
5 Q In fact, you said yesterday, I think, that at Pacific
6 you were hoping to work there for years, right?
7 You wanted to make a career o ut of doing that,
8 right?
9 A No.
10 Q Well, didn't you testify in response to one of the
11 cross-examination questions of one of the lawyers here
12 while you were at Pacific, I think it was Mr. Geduldig, he
13 asked you if he thought you would be expecting to stay
14 there long, and you said, no, I was hoping to be there for
15 years.
16 A With regards to setting up the business.
17 Q This was at Pacific, you wanted a career out of it?
18 A No.
19 Q You wanted a career out of the other one; is that
20 your testimony?
21 A In regards to setting up the business, it was set up
22 not necessarily with a short term projection in mind.
23 Q Anyway, when you were at Pacific, whether you wanted
24 to make a career out of it or not, you didn't have any
25 hesitation in taking $290 when you were going to get $40
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFIC IAL COURT REPORTER
6875
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 out of it from people who were in desperate financial
2 condition; is that correct?
3 A No.
4 Q It's not correct. When you were --
5 A I had hesitancy.
6 Q But you did it for the $40 a pop?
7 A Yes.
8 Q Those were the people who were probably the most
9 vulnerable set of people you could take $249 from, people
10 in desperate condition?
11 A Desperate need of money I would think.
12 Q When you were working at Sterling, sir, you had a
13 pang of consciousness?
14 A I can't answer that yes or no.
15 Q Now that you weren't getting any money out of doing
16 it, sir -- by the way, the people who you spoke to who
17 were prospective members of Sterling, they weren't in
18 desperate financial condition, were they?
19 A I wouldn't know.
20 Q Isn't it fair to say on the whole they tended to be
21 people who had pretty -- at least middle or upper level
22 management positions? Owners of businesses and so forth?
23 A I would say on the whole, yes.
24 Q And none of them on the phone, I mean, certainly if
25 anyone on the phone said, hey, I'm having financial
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6876
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 difficulties, they would hang up. So the people who were
2 talking to you apparently had money?
3 A Apparently.
4 Q Certainly the people who wanted to pay, they had
5 money. They had money because they had money to spend on
6 this, right?
7 A Apparently.
8 Q This wasn't a necessity. I mean, this wasn't like
9 food or clothing, right?
10 A Right.
11 Q But you had a pang of conscience when you weren't
12 getting any money out of it and you decided you weren't

13 going to give them what they wanted although you had
14 absolutely no basis of any of the things they earned.
15 You had a pang of conscience, sir, right? You
16 had a pang of conscience, sir, when you weren't going to
17 get any money out of it?
18 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
19 Q And you decided that those people weren't going to
20 get what they were asking for, right?
21 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
22 Q And, sir, you didn't want to continue working there
23 because you wanted to be out of there so that you could be
24 working a job, right? You didn't want to be kept on at
25 Sterling?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6877
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Trabulus

1 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
2 Q You purposely screwed up that portion of your
3 cooperation so you could get out of there and ge t work and
4 earn some money, right?
5 A No.
6 Q You purposely didn't make sales so you could be
7 fired?
8 A No.
9 THE COURT: You are getting very rapid again,
10 Mr. Trabulus. I'm having trouble following you and the
11 jury may have the same trouble and I know the reporter is
12 having trouble. So slow down, please.
13 BY MR. TRABULUS:
14 Q You were perfectly happy to continue cooperating,
15 sir, when you were making phone calls and it didn't cost
16 you a dime, right?
17 A I was not happy.
18 MR. TRABULUS: I have no further questions.
19 THE COURT: Anything else?
20 MR. GEDULDIG: May I have just like one question,
21 please?
22 THE COURT: Yes.
23 (Continued.)
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6878
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Geduldig

1 CROSS-EXAMINATION

2 BY MR. GEDULDIG:
3 Q Mr. Ihlenfeldt, yesterday I had asked you some
4 questions regarding the mail lists. Do you recall that?
5 A Vaguely, sir.
6 Q And there was a series of questions regarding the
7 training you received while you were at Sterling?
8 A Yes.
9 Q And I asked you if you were told specifically by the
10 people that were training you that mailing lists were not
11 used at Sterling. Do you recall that?
12 A Yes, I recall.
13 Q And yesterday I think you responded by nodding your
14 head and as a result it doesn't show up in the transcript
15 of yesterday's testimony. But am I correct in saying that
16 you were told specifically while you were training at
17 Sterling that mailing lists were not used?
18 A Yes.
19 MR. GEDULDIG: That's it, Judge.
20 THE COURT: Anything else?
21 MR. NEVILLE: Yes, Your Honor.
22 (Contin ued.)
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6879
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 CROSS-EXAMINATION
2 BY MR. NEVILLE:
3 Q Good morning, Mr. Ihlenfeldt. My name is Jim
4 Neville. I represent Scott Michavelson.
5 You said you worked at Sterling for six or seven,
6 eight working days, something like that?
7 A Yes.
8 Q And the supervisors that worked with you were Tom
9 Randall, Robert Lamb and Michavel Powers?
10 A Yes.
11 Q Did you hear that tape the other day where somebody
12 said to you that you're a nice guy but you think too
13 much? We don't care.
14 A Yes.
15 Q Whose voice was that?
16 A Tom Randall.
17 Q Was he the one that interviewed you for the job there
18 at Sterling?
19 A No.
20 Q He's the one that trained you?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And d o you remember what he looks like?
23 A Yes.
24 Q Is he here in this courtroom?
25 A I don't see him.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6880
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 Q Robert Lamb. Do you remember what he looks like?
2 A Yes.
3 Q Is he in this courtroom?
4 A I don't see him here.
5 Q Michavel Powers. Do you remember what he looks like?
6 A Yes.
7 Q And do you see him here in this courtroom?
8 A No.
9 Q Tom Randall was the one that said to you, you think
10 too much, these American Mastercards, ha, ha, ha. He's
11 the one that said that, wasn't he?
12 A Yes.
13 Q The only personal physical contact you would have
14 with Who's Who Worldwide's offices was when you went in
15 for an interview with Tara Green, Tara Garboski, right?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And in that interview was where Tara Garbo ski was
18 telling you about telling the truth and following the
19 pitch, right?
20 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
21 Q Do you remember the taped transcript? Do you
22 remember the taped transcript that Mr. Schoer went over
23 with you?
24 A I remember it vaguely. I don't remember the part. I
25 remember the part sticking to the script. I don't
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6881
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 remember the part where it was her saying that you had to
2 tell the truth.
3 Q I misspoke. I apologize.
4 She didn't tell you to tell the truth. What she
5 said was "it's more cost effective but by following the
6 script, first of all, you won't confuse them. You will
7 not lie to them. You will not stretch the truth, and
8 you'll close because it's all mapped out for you."
9 (Indicating) Is she, Tara Garboski, who is
10 sitting in this courtroom -- that's not Tom Randall that
11 said that to you? Do you remember that?
12 A I don't recall the conversation exactly, but if it's
13 on the tape, then it's on the tape.
14 Q And you're the same guy who knew after a few days at
15 Who's Who Worldwide or at Sterling, wherever you worked,
16 that you knew that the pitch was a bunch of lies and
17 that's why you didn't want to take credit card numbers,
18 right?
19 A Based on my experience, portions of the scripts I
20 knew weren't true or I assumed weren't true.
21 Q Based on what Marty Biegelman said to you, that's
22 what it was, right?
23 A I can't answer that with a yes or no.
24 Q You said that you took out of Sterling about 30
25 cards?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6882
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 A I believe that's the amount.
2 Q Do you know that each one of those cards costs about
3 $30? Do you know that?
4 A No.
5 Q Do you have any idea that those cards represented a
6 big investment?
7 A No.
8 Q Do you realize that what you did when you walked out
9 of that office in Manhattan, not the little boiler room
10 basement operation that you were doing, but that
11 impressive office in Manhattan, that you stole about $900
12 worth of property of that company? Do you realize that?
13 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
14 THE COURT: Sustained.
15 BY MR. NEVILLE:
16 Q Do you know that those cards were worth about $900
17 bucks?
18 A No.
19 Q That's like seeing a pile of nine $100 bills and
20 putting them in your pocket and walking out. That's no
21 different.
22 A Is that a question?
23 Q Right.
24 A No.
25 Q It's not the same.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6883
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 A No, it's not the same.
2 Q So if you steal my car as opposed to stealing money
3 out of my bank account, you are not stealing?
4 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
5 THE COURT: You have to be quick.
6 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
7 THE COURT: Sustained.
8 See, if you stand up while the questioner -- it
9 will not distract him because he can't see you, so if you
10 stand up before the question, this is a technique I
11 learned a long time ago, get ready. You see as soon as
12 the question ends, you're in there.
13 BY MR. NEVILLE:
14 Q All I know, it's not a crime when you stole those
15 cards because you did it at the behest of the United
16 States Government, right?
17 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
18 THE COURT: Sustained.
19 Well, I advised Ms. Scott what to do but she
20 didn't take my advise. It's okay, she has a right not
21 to.
22 BY MR. NEVILLE:
23 Q You say you walked out with one of the pitch sheets
24 too, right?
25 A I believe I did.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6884
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 Q Do you have that with you?
2 A No.
3 Q Do you know where that is?
4 A No.
5 Q Do you have any idea what was on that?
6 A I'm familiar with the script for the associate
7 membership.
8 Q Do you have any idea that those pitches changed
9 sometimes from day-to-day or hour-to-hour? Do you have
10 any idea?
11 A I wouldn't know but it wouldn't surprise me at all.
12 Q Is there something wrong with that?
13 A I don't understand your question.
14 Q You're trying to leave this jury with the impression
15 ch anging a pitch in a company that is selling over the
16 telephone somehow is a crime?
17 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
18 THE COURT: Sustained.
19 BY MR. NEVILLE:
20 Q Sir, do you remember if Marty Biegelman is the one
21 that told you to take those cards and that pitch sheet?
22 A I don't recall if he did or didn't.
23 Q You didn't even listen to any of these tapes until
24 just around when this trial started, right, where you're
25 talking on them?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6885
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 A I believe I listened to the tapes, the body wire
2 tapes, not long after I made them.
3 Q How about the tapes where you called in as a
4 prospective customer of Who's Who Worldwide?
5 A I might have listened to them until about two months
6 ago or a little bit less than that.
7 Q You said that Marty Biegel man did tell you what to
8 ask in those conversations, right, when you called in?
9 A He gave me some questions he wanted me to ask.
10 Q About nominations?
11 A Yes.
12 Q Mailing lists?
13 A Yes.
14 Q How long you've been in business?
15 A Yes.
16 Q Do you know that there was a man here that testified
17 that was doing the same thing for Marty Biegelman who said
18 Marty Biegelman said not to ask him any particular
19 questions? Do you know that?
20 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
21 THE COURT: Sustained.
22 BY MR. NEVILLE:
23 Q Steve Watstein, do you know him?
24 A No.
25 Q Do you remember the conversation with Scott
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6886
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 Michavelson where you asked him about one of those
2 membership seminars and he told you there had been one

3 planned at Hilton Head but it never went off? Do you
4 remember that?
5 A I remember a conversation about that.
6 Q You just remember a conversation, but whether or not
7 Scott said that Hilton Head went off doesn't matter, does
8 it?
9 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
10 THE COURT: Sustained.
11 BY MR. NEVILLE:
12 Q The only experience you had was at Sterling, right,
13 working?
14 A No.
15 Q Did you ever work at Who's Who Worldwide as a
16 salesperson?
17 A The only -- you asked me if I had any experience
18 working.
19 Q Yes or no?
20 A I have plenty of experience working.
21 Q In the contention of this case as compared to
22 Sterling Who's Who and Who's Who Worldwide, which place
23 did you work in?
24 A Sterling Who's Who.
25 Q Sterling and Who's Who?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

6887
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 A Sterling Who's Who.
2 Q So you didn't work at Who's Who Worldwide?
3 A No.
4 Q You didn't work at Marcus Avenue in Lake Success, New
5 York?
6 A No.
7 Q And the only time you went out there was when you had
8 an interview with Tara Garboski who told you that you
9 shouldn't lie, right?
10 A Yes.
11 Q And the work you did at Sterling and at this Sterling
12 place with Tom Randall was a place where he laughed about
13 the credit card. And he isn't in this courtroom, is he?
14 THE COURT: Sustained. We've had that several
15 times.
16 MR. NEVILLE: Well, I think it is important, Your
17 Honor.
18 THE COURT: Yes, well, you've had it already and
19 within the last 15 minutes, I might add.
20 MR. NEVILLE: I'll finish up. This will be the
21 end, Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: I'm not precluding you. I just don't
23 want you to be repetitious.
24 MR. NEVILLE: I understand, Your Honor. Thank
25 you.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6888
Ihlenfeldt-cross/Neville

1 BY MR. NEVILLE:
2 Q You said within just a few days of working at
3 Sterling, that you didn't want to make those sales on the
4 phone because based on your experience you didn't want to
5 trick those people, right?
6 A I don't believe I mentioned tricking people.
7 Q Have you ever heard of a man named Mr. Saffer?
8 A Yes.
9 Q Do you know he testified at this trial?
10 A Yes.
11 Q Do you know that he was a salesperson at Who's Who
12 Worldwide for years and years?
13 A I didn't know that.
14 Q Did you know that he worked at Who's Who Worldwide
15 almost from its very inception back in the late '80s or
16 ea rly '90s at Port Washington?
17 A No.
18 Q Do you know that he probably made many scores of
19 thousands of more telephone calls than you ever did at
20 Sterling?
21 A No.
22 Q Do you know that Mr. Saffer who came in here and
23 testified that said for years and years as he was
24 following that script, he didn't think he was doing
25 anything wrong, and you figured this out in a couple
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6889
Ihlenfeldt-redirect/Scott

1 days?
2 MS. SCOTT: Objection.
3 THE COURT: Sustained.
4 MR. NEVILLE: Thank you. I have no further
5 questions.
6 THE COURT: Anything else?
7 MS. SCOTT: Yes, Your Honor. May I have a
8 moment?
9 THE COURT: Surely.
10 (Counsel confer.)
11 MS. SCOTT: Thank you, Your Honor.
12 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
13 BY MS. SCOTT:

14 Q You were just asked about Alan Saffer.
15 A Yes.
16 Q And whether you knew anything about him.
17 A Yes.
18 Q Before you came to court here -- withdrawn.
19 Did you meet Alan Saffer back in the witness room
20 when you came to court here?
21 A Yes.
22 Q Before that time had you ever met him before?
23 A No.
24 Q Had you ever seen him before?
25 A No.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6890
Ihlenfeldt-redirect/Scott

1 Q Had you ever heard anything about him before that
2 time?
3 A He was one of the names that Marty Biegelman gave me
4 to ask for on the phone.
5 Q And beyond that and beyond the conversation that you
6 had with him over the phone, did you ever have any other
7 knowledge about Mr. Saffer?
8 A No.
9 Q Now, you've been asked a lot of questions about how
10 lon g it took you to figure out that there was a scam going
11 on at Sterling Who's Who. Do you remember those
12 questions?
13 A Yes.
14 Q And you answered today that based on your experience
15 you were able to figure out within about a week to a
16 little bit more that there was a scam going on there,
17 correct?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And can you tell us what you meant by that?
20 A Well, at that point not only was I involved in three
21 scams but I had worked as an informant on two other ones
22 and some of the statements in the script were inconsistent
23 with what I assumed was the nature of the sales process
24 and that was that people were denying --
25 MR. GEDULDIG: Judge, I object to what he
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6891
Ihlenfeldt-redirect/Scott

1 assumed. It's just speculation on his part.
2 THE COURT : Well, it's true that this was brought
3 out on cross-examination and you would normally have a
4 right to go into it, but in the exercise of my discretion
5 I'll sustain the objection.
6 BY MS. SCOTT:
7 Q Now, you've been asked a lot of questions about when
8 it was that you figured out that Costa Consultants, the
9 company you started with John Beatrice, was actually a
10 scam. Do you remember all of those questions on
11 cross-examination?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Do you remember that you testified that it took you
14 approximately three weeks to determine that there really
15 were not going to be any loans provided to people who
16 applied to Costa Consultants?
17 A Yes.
18 Q Now, by the way, you've never disputed that you did
19 eventually learn that no loans were going to be provided,
20 correct?
21 A Right.
22 Q And you've never dispu ted that, you continued to tell
23 people loans would be available, although you knew they
24 weren't?
25 A Yes, we did.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6892
Ihlenfeldt-redirect/Scott

1 Q And that's why you pled guilty; isn't that right?
2 A Correct.
3 Q But what the defense has been focusing on was these
4 first two weeks when you were working at Costa
5 Consultants, correct?
6 A Yes.
7 Q Do you remember that the defense has read to you some
8 of your testimony from a prior hearing in the past couple
9 days?
10 A Yes.
11 Q And do you remember that they read you that testimony
12 twice?
13 A Yes.
14 Q And do you remember that on both occasions they
15 stopped just short of reading to you the part where you've
16 testified consistently with what you've been testifying to
17 here t oday?
18 MR. TRABULUS: Objection, Your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Sustained.
20 If you think that the testimony, the portion of
21 the testimony of the witness was not complete, you can
22 read any other portion you want to read.
23 MS. SCOTT: Yes. I would like to do that, Your
24 Honor.
25 THE COURT: Go ahead.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6893
Ihlenfeldt-redirect/Scott

1 BY MS. SCOTT:
2 Q The part that has not been read to you today is this
3 part. Page 51 of Government's Exhibit 3500-24-W.
4 "Question: And you knew that people were not
5 going to get loans, correct?
6 "Answer: Well, we hoped, we hoped that we can
7 run the business in a sense different than Howard had run
8 it to where we could find legitimate lenders and have some
9 Longevity to this business rather than to run it for a
10 couple mon ths and close it down."
11 Do you remember giving that question in response
12 to that -- I'm sorry, do you remember giving that answer
13 in response to that question?
14 A Yes.
15 Q Now, you've been asked a lot of questions about the
16 lead cards that you took out of Sterling Who's Who,
17 correct?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And you've been asked in particular about that card,
20 the pope card. Do you remember that?
21 A Yes.
22 Q Mr. Neville said when he was cross-examining you a
23 moment ago, that these cards were worth approximately
24 $900. Do you remember him saying that?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6894
Ihlenfeldt-recross/Geduldig

1 Q Do you remember when Mr. Trabulus, when he
2 cross-examined you before, said that these cards were just
3 about worthless? Do you remember him saying that?

4 MR. TRABULUS: Objection, Your Honor.
5 THE COURT: Sustained.
6 MS. SCOTT: Thank you, Mr. Ihlenfeldt. I have no
7 further questions.
8 THE COURT: Anything else?
9 MR. GEDULDIG: I have a couple.
10 RECROSS EXAMINATION
11 BY MR. GEDULDIG:
12 Q Mr. Ihlenfeldt, Ms. Scott just asked you if Alan
13 Saffer was one of the names that you had gotten from
14 Mr. Biegelman. Do you remember that?
15 A Yes.
16 Q And did you get any of these names from Mr. Biegelman
17 as well? Did you get the name Michavel Maxes as an
18 individual that you should try to call at Who's Who
19 Worldwide?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Did you get the name of Marty Gross or Marty Graham
22 to call as an individual at Who's Who Worldwide?
23 A I don't recall.
24 Q Did you get the name Sue Mantell as an individual for
25 you to call at Who's Who Worldwide?

OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6895
Ihlenfeldt-recross/Geduldig

1 A I believe so, but I don't recall.
2 Q Did you get the name Angela Palmer as an individual
3 to call at Who's Who Worldwide?
4 A I don't recall.
5 Q Did you get the name Carl Roper as an individual to
6 call at Who's Who Worldwide?
7 A I don't recall.
8 Q Did you get the name Marilyn Pierce as an individual
9 to call at Who's Who Worldwide?
10 A I believe so, but I can't be sure.
11 Q Did you get the name Todd -- I'm sorry, Madeline
12 Bailey as an individual to call at Who's Who Worldwide?
13 A I believe so, but I don't recall.
14 Q Did you get the name Michele Kelly as an individual
15 to call at Who's Who Worldwide?
16 A I believe so, but I don't recall.
17 Q Did you get the name Joe Parks as an individual to
18 call at Who's Who Worldwide ?
19 A I don't recall.
20 Q Did you get the name Roseanne Munch or Roseanne
21 Patton as an individual to call at Who's Who Worldwide?
22 A I believe so, but I don't recall as a fact.
23 Q Did you get the name Tina Walsh as an individual to
24 call at Who's Who Worldwide?
25 A I believe so. I don't recall as a fact.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6896
Ihlenfeldt-recross/Geduldig

1 Q Did you get the name Kenneth McCarthy as an
2 individual to call at Who's Who Worldwide?
3 A I believe so, but I don't recall as a fact.
4 Q Did you get the name Al Jenson as an individual to
5 call at Who's Who Worldwide?
6 A I don't recall.
7 Q Did you ever have a written list of the people from
8 Mr. Biegelman of the individuals you should try to call at
9 Who's Who Worldwide?
10 A I wrote the lists myself. He provided me name s and I
11 wrote the list myself, so he didn't provide the list.
12 Q But he gave you these names?
13 A Yes.
14 Q Did he give them to you right off the top of his head
15 or was he reading them as well?
16 A I don't know.
17 Q Do you know if you were able to contact all of the
18 people that were on that list?
19 A I don't believe so, but I can't recall for a fact if
20 I did or didn't.
21 Q You certainly called more than four salespeople;
22 isn't that fair to say?
23 A Yes.
24 Q And you spoke to more than four salespeople?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6897
Ihlenfeldt-recross/Geduldig

1 Q And you recorded conversations with more than four
2 salespeople?
3 A Yes.
4 MR. GEDULDIG: I have no further questions.
5 THE COURT: Anything else?
6 MS. SCOTT: Nothing furth er.
7 THE COURT: You may step down.
8 Please call your next witness.
9 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, we have a series of tapes
10 that we'll play now.
11 Your Honor, the first one is Exhibit 13-01. The
12 transcript is 13-01-B, for Baker. The date is August 15,
13 1994.
14 It's a call to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
15 salesperson is Madeline Bailey.
16 (Audiotape played.)
17 (Start and stop.)
18 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-02. The
19 transcript is 13-02-A, for Able. The date is August 22,
20 1994.
21 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
22 salesperson is Jill Barnes.
23 (Audiotape played.)
24 (Start and stop.)
25 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-03. The date is
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6898
1 August 24, 1994.
2 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
3 salesperson is Alan Davidson.
4 MR. TRABULUS: 13-03-A or B?
5 MR. WHITE: I'm sorry, 13-03-B, for Baker.
6 (Audiotape played.)
7 (Start and stop.)
8 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-04. The
9 transcript is 13-04-B, for Baker. The date is August 29,
10 1994.
11 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
12 salesperson is Ed Schaveffer.
13 (Audiotape played.)
14 (Start and stop).
15 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-05. The
16 transcript is 13-05-C, for Charlie. The date is September
17 6, 1994.
18 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Roseanne
19 Patton.
20 (Audiotape played.)
21 (Start and stop.)
22 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-07. The
23 transcript is 13-07-C, for Charlie. The date is August --
24 I'm sorry, October 24, 1994.
25 It's a call to Sterling Who's Who and Scott
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6899
1 Matthews.
2 (Audiotape played.)
3 (Start and stop.)
4 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-09. The
5 transcript is 13-09-B, for Baker. The date is October 27,
6 1994.
7 The call is to Sterling Who's Who and Andrea
8 Franklin.
9 (Audiotape played.)
10 (Start and stop.)
11 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-10. The
12 transcript is 13-10-A, for Able. The date is October 28,
13 1994.
14 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Linda May,
15 M-A-Y.
16 (Audiotape played.)
17 (Start and stop.)
18 MR. WHITE: The next is Exhibit 13-11. The
19 transcript is 13-11-A, for Able. The date is October 28,
20 1994.
21 It's a call to Sterling Who's Who and Anthony
22 Myers, M-Y-E-R-S.
23 (Audiotape played.)
24 (Start and stop.)
25 MR. WHITE: They next one is 13-12. The


OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6900
1 transcript is 13-12-C, for Charlie. The date is October
2 28, 1994.
3 It's a call to Sterling Who's Who and Robert
4 Stanley.
5 (Audiotape played.)
6 (Start and stop.)
7 MR. WHITE: Next, this is Exhibit 13-16. The
8 transcript is 13-16-B, for Baker. The date is November 2,
9 1994.
10 The call is from Sterling Who's Who and Anthony
11 Myer.
12 (Audiotape played.)
13 (Start and stop.)
14 MR. WHITE: The next is Exhibit 13-17. The
15 transcript is 13-17-B, for Baker. The date is November 3,
16 1994.
17 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Roseann
18 Patton.
19 (Audiotape played.)
20 (Start and stop.)
21 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-19. The
22 transcript is 13-19-A, for Able. The date is November 4,
23 1994.
24 The c all is to Who's Who Worldwide and Brian
25 Sherman.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6901
1 (Audiotape played.)
2 (Start and stop.)
3 MR. WHITE: Next is 13-21. The transcript is
4 13-21-B, for Baker. The date is November 7, 1994.
5 The call is to Sterling Who's Who and Sam
6 Christopher.
7 (Audiotape played.)
8 (Start and stop.)
9 MR. WHITE: Next is Exhibit 13-29. The
10 transcript is 13-29-A, for Able. The date is December 12,
11 1994.
12 The call is to Sterling Who's Who and Mark
13 Johnson.
14 (Audiotape played.)
15 (Start sand stop.)
16 MR. WHITE: Next is 13-31. The transcript is
17 13-31-C, for Charlie. The date is December 14, 1994.
18 The call is to Sterling Who's Who and to Scott
19 Matthews.
20 (Audiotape played.)
21 (Start and stop.)
22 MR. WHITE : Next is 13-34. The transcript is
23 13-34-A, for Able. The date is December 19, 1994.
24 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Jill
25 Barnes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6902
1 (Audiotape played.)
2 (Start and stop.)
3 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-36. 13-36-A, for
4 Able, is the transcript. December 30, 1994.
5 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and John
6 Stevens, S-T-E-V-E-N-S.
7 (Audiotape played.)
8 (Start and stop.)
9 MR. WHITE: The next is 13-37. The transcript is
10 13-37-A, for Able. The date is December 21, 1994.
11 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Alan
12 Saffer.
13 (Audiotape played.)
14 (Start and stop.)
15 MR. WHITE: The next is 13-40. The transcript is
16 13-40-C, for Charlie. The date is December 28, 1994. The
17 call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Mari lyn Pierce.
18 (Audiotape played.)
19 (Start and stop.)
20 MR. WHITE: The next is 13-42. The transcript is
21 13-42-B, for baker. The date is January 3, 1995.
22 This is a call to Sterling Who's Who and Barbara
23 McCabe, M-C-C-A-B-E.
24 (Audiotape played.)
25 (Start and stop.)
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6903
1 MR. WHITE: Next is 13-44. The transcript is
2 13-44-A, for Able. The date is January 23, 1995.
3 The call is to Sterling and to Mark Johnson.
4 (Audiotape played.)
5 (Start and stop.)
6 MR. WHITE: And next is 13-63. The transcript is
7 13-63-C, for Charlie. The date is December 22, 1994.
8 It's a call to Sterling Who's Who and to Kathy
9 Brady, B-R-A-D-Y.
10 (Audiotape played.)
11 (Start and stop.)
12 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, that's it for the tapes
13 right now.
14 THE COURT: All right. We'll take a ten-minute
15 recess.
16 Please don't discuss the case. Keep an open
17 mind.
18 Please recess yourselves.
19 (Jury exits.)
20 (Recess taken.)
21 THE COURT: I want to advise counsel that I have
22 an Order to Show Cause that I had made returnable at
23 5 o'clock this afternoon, because it is a reasonable hour
24 to make that. Wouldn't you say that, Mr. Neville?
25 MR. NEVILLE: Absolutely.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6904
1 THE COURT: And this is to quash a subpoena in
2 this case. The person who is subpoenaed, according to the
3 information I have, and I haven't got the papers, is
4 Sandra Barnes of Marquis Who's Who who lives in Arizona
5 and who was subpoenaed by the defendant Gordon.
6 I signed the subpoena according to this report to
7 appear o n March 9th. Her attorney, Robert Restrum,
8 R-E-S-T-R-U-M, will be here at 5 o'clock today. So I
9 suggest you stay and wait for Mr. Restrum.
10 Okay.
11 Is that all right with you, Mr. Neville?
12 MR. NEVILLE: That's perfectly fine with me.
13 MR. WHITE: We'll not have to wear bunny suits.
14 MR. JENKS: I'm willing to start at 6 o'clock, if
15 you are, Judge.
16 THE COURT: I'm glad to hear that, Mr. Jenks.
17 MR. NEVILLE: Before the break when Mr. White
18 played that series of segments of tapes, it was brought to
19 my attention and I think it is an important point. First
20 of all, none of the people that were speaking to
21 Mr. Watstein are in this room. But there is, there are
22 two if not three conversations with somebody by the name
23 of Scott Matthews.
24 THE COURT: It's not your client.
25 MR. NEVILLE: I know, but --
OW EN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6905
1 THE COURT: You want me --
2 MR. NEVILLE: But on the transcripts it just says
3 Scott and I think that is confusing.
4 THE COURT: I'll tell them. All right.
5 (Jury enters.)
6 THE COURT: Members of the jury, there is a
7 tape-recording played involving a Sterling Who's Who
8 conversation with a Scott Matthews. That is not the Scott
9 Michavelson that is a defendant in this case. I assume you
10 know that but I'm telling that to you anyway.
11 All right. You may proceed.
12 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, the government calls
13 Elliot Zerring.
14 (Continued.)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6906
Zerring-direct/White

1 E L L I O T Z E R R I N G , having been first duly
2 sworn by the Clerk of the Court, was examined and
3 testified as follows:
4 THE WITNESS: Elliot Zerring, Z-E-R-R-I-N-G.
5 DIRECT EXAMINATION
6 BY MR. WHITE: /(.
7 Q Mr. Zerring, can you tell us how old you are?
8 A 50 years old.
9 Q Where do you live?
10 A Florida.
11 Q Are you married?
12 A Yes, I am.
13 Q Do you have any children?
14 A Yes, I do.
15 Q How many?
16 A Two.
17 Q Can you tell us how far you went in school?
18 A Graduated high school.
19 Q Now, are you currently employed?
20 A No, I'm not.
21 Q Now, can you tell us for most of your adult life,
22 what kind of work did you do?
23 A I was a public insurance adjuster.
24 Q And can you describe what a public insurance adjuster
25 does?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

6907
Zerring-direct/White

1 A Yes. A public insurance adjuster is one who
2 presents, prepares and adjusts insurance claims on behalf
3 of a policyholder.
4 Q When you say he prepares, presents and adjusts a
5 claim, tell us specifically what he does?
6 A Well, as an example, if we were representing a
7 homeowner, someone who sustained a water damage or a fire
8 loss to their home, we would be called in to represent the
9 policyholder's interest. At that time we would go through
10 the process of preparing that claim with the policyholder
11 and present it ultimately to the insurance adjusters or
12 the insurance company's representatives in its entirety.
13 THE COURT: So in other words, you didn't work
14 for the insurance company. You worked for the person
15 making the claim?
16 THE WITNESS: That's correct, Your Honor.
17 THE COURT: All right.

18 BY MR. WHITE:
19 Q You represent the interests of the policyholder
20 against his insurance company?
21 A That's correct.
22 Q Now, can you describe for us how it is that a public
23 adjuster gets paid?
24 A Well, we receive at the outset, we are retained by a
25 contractual agreement for a fee of approximately 10 to 12
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6908
Zerring-direct/White

1 percent normally and at the end of that claim, when that
2 claim is adjusted, we at that point would receive our fee.
3 Q And it's 10 to 12 percent of what?
4 A 10 to 12 percent of the amount collected for the
5 policyholder.
6 THE COURT: Is that what is called a contingent
7 fee?
8 THE WITNESS: Yes, Your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Suppose there is nothing collected.
10 What happens?
11 THE WITNESS: We get zero.

12 BY MR. WHITE:
13 Q Now, are public insurance adjusters licensed by
14 anyone?
15 A Yes, they are.
16 Q By whom?
17 A We are licensed by the State of New York.
18 Q Can you tell us how long you were a public insurance
19 adjuster?
20 A From approximately 1965, 1966.
21 Q Until when?
22 A Until 1992, 1993 I was licensed.
23 Q Now, have you ever heard of a business called
24 Interstate Adjusters?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6909
Zerring-direct/White

1 Q And what was Interstate Adjusters?
2 A That was my company in which I had a 50 percent
3 interest in that company ownership.
4 Q When did you begin operations for that company?
5 A Approximately 1978.
6 Q Now, were you ever involved in submitting fraudulent
7 claims to insurance companies?
8 A Yes, I was.

9 Q Can you tell us approximately how many?
10 A Well, we handled many, many claims. Fraudulent
11 claims. I would say over my years working as a public
12 insurance adjuster, there were probably hundreds.
13 Q Can you describe for us how the typical fraudulent
14 insurance claim you were involved in would work?
15 A Once retained by the policyholder, we would then go
16 through the process of putting the claim together such as
17 if I may use as an example, if there was a homeowner who
18 suffered a fire, a water damage in their home, we would
19 then put together building estimates, inflate building
20 estimates for the structure or any improvements and
21 betterments in their home as well as prepare inventories
22 of the contents of that home such as clothing, furniture
23 and what have you, and inflate the value, meaning for
24 arguments sake, 200 garments, we would s ay 5 or 600
25 garments, if it was $20 or $30, we would say $50 or $60.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6910
Zerring-direct/White

1 The same way it would work with the structure of
2 the building or the betterments to the building such as
3 roof damage or damage to the instruction to the interior
4 structure, wall panelling, carpeting and so on.
5 Q Would you create any phony documents in support of
6 these inflated loss figures?
7 A Well, what we would do is if the actual damage to
8 someone's home, again, to the structure, let's say
9 hypothetical the actual damage was $5,000 or $10,000, we
10 would have estimates, written estimates for greater
11 numbers, maybe 20, 30, 40, $50,000. We're talking now,
12 you know, specifically in homeowners.
13 We also handled commercial losses which are much
14 larger losses.
15 Q Can you describe what you mean by a commercial loss?
16 A Someone who owned their own business, a manufacturer,
17 retail, store owner.
18 Q Would you take any steps to bribe insurance company
19 personnel in connection with these claims?
20 A Yes, we would.
21 Q Tell us what you would do.
22 A Well, during my long years in the -- the extensive
23 years in the business, I became friendly with the
24 representatives of the insurance company, their adjusters
25 would be assigned by the insurance companies, as well as
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6911
Zerring-direct/White

1 their experts such as builders, accountants, salvage
2 people who -- to explain what a salvage person is, someone
3 who determines what the values of certain items are such
4 as hard goods, garments, and so forth and so on.
5 Q And you were saying from your experience in the field
6 knowing these people, what would you do?
7 A Yes. I would, over the years, I was able to bribe
8 them and pay them money in order for them to go along with
9 the inflation of the claim and thus settle the loss for a
10 much greater amount than was actually sustained by the
11 policyholder. Thus, allowing me to earn a greater fee.
12 Q Now, where would you get the money that you would use
13 to pay these bribes to experts and insurance adjusters?
14 A What I would do is, after processing the claim or
15 during the course of processing the claim I would go to
16 the person who retained me which is the policyholder and I
17 would tell him that, for example, his actual loss was
18 $50,000. I told him that I could probably get him
19 somewhere like 100, $150,000, and that I would need, and
20 this is just an example, that I would need $25,000 in cash

21 to make payoffs for all of these people I just described
22 in order for them to sign off on the claim in order for us
23 to effectuate that settlement of 150, $200,000.
24 Q Now, in the case of these fraudulent insurance
25 claims, how would you and your adjusting firm get paid?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6912
Zerring-direct/White

1 A Basically two ways. We would get paid by check, and
2 we would also get paid by U.S. currency in cash in order
3 that we may pay off the adjusters and accountants and
4 their experts.
5 Q Now, let's take those two ways separately.
6 The check that you would get, what would that
7 represent?
8 A That would represent our fee in which we would take
9 that fee and deposit it into our business, our corporate
10 business in which I owned 50 percent of.
11 Q Is that the 10 to 12 percent fe e you described
12 before?
13 A That's correct.
14 Q And what is the cash you said you would get? How
15 much of that would stay with you and your firm?
16 A Well, whatever cash we would receive, myself
17 included, would make the payoffs to those people that I
18 bribed and the balance of that cash I would retain in my
19 office. And we had our own pool where each of the
20 adjusters in my office would get a percentage of the
21 amount of cash that we retained and spread it around in
22 that fashion.
23 Q Were you involved in a fraudulent claim by a company
24 called Rafella Sports?
25 A Yes, I was.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6913
Zerring-direct/White

1 Q Can you tell us how that claim first began?
2 A Well, it started -- I was originally contacted by an
3 insurance broker who I did business with, you k now, some
4 years ago, and he asked me to come to his home one
5 evening. He advised me at that time that he was
6 recommending a new account, quite a large account, Rafella
7 Sportswear in the garment business and asked me my opinion
8 who I should write the insurance with. I gave him my
9 opinion.
10 He asked me at that time was National Union or
11 American International Group a good insurance company and
12 would they give me good service and I told them absolutely
13 correct.
14 Q You say American Insurance Group?
15 A American International Group.
16 Q Is that known by the initials AIG?
17 A That's correct. I believe they are the parent.
18 Q Now, what happened next in connection with this
19 claim?
20 A At sometime after having meetings with him and being
21 called to his home, he then advised me that he retained a
22 client and secur ed the insurance for the Rafella people
23 and he had asked me at this point he would like me to meet
24 with his policyholder which I consented to do.
25 Q And what happened at that meeting?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6914
Zerring-direct/White

1 A At that meeting the policyholder, I met him in a
2 restaurant in midtown, New York, and at that meeting the
3 policyholder asked me if I'm familiar with the policy that
4 was written and I told him I was. He asked me do I know
5 the people, if I had some type of a claim or what have
6 you, would you be able to get me good service,
7 satisfactory service. I told him I would.
8 Q Did you understand that he was asking you to
9 participate in a fraudulent insurance claim?
10 A Well, I felt that that's what it was leading up to,
11 yes.
12 Q Did there come a point when you learned o f a loss
13 sustained by Rafella Sportswear?
14 A Yes, I did.
15 Q When was that?
16 A That was in September of 1989.
17 Q And what happened after that? I'm sorry, let me ask
18 a different question.
19 What sort of loss did Rafella Sportswear sustain?
20 A They sustained a water damage actually from their
21 sprinkler system.
22 Q Where did they sustain the damage?
23 A The damage was sustained in a large warehouse
24 facility in Bayonne, New Jersey.
25 Q Tell us what sort of business Rafella Sportswear was?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6915
Zerring-direct/White

1 A Basically importer, manufacturers of ladies
2 sportswear. Actually they were specifically in the
3 coordinate business.
4 Q You mentioned water damage.
5 Can you explain a little more precisely what sort
6 of damage they sust ained.
7 A Yes. There was water as a result of sprinkler heads
8 that discharged in their warehouse.
9 Q Now, did you then participate in a scheme to inflate
10 their insurance claim?
11 A Yes, I did.
12 Q How did you do that?
13 A Well, first, initially the loss was reported to my
14 office by their insurance broker. I received a call that
15 morning in my office in Long Island at the time and I was
16 notified that there was an insurance claim. And the
17 insurance broker who called that claim into me advised me
18 that I would be receiving a call from the policyholder
19 which I did shortly after that.
20 And he called me, I believe it was from his car
21 and advised me that he sustained a water damage loss at
22 his premises, at Bayonne, New Jersey, and asked me if I
23 would meet him at the loss premises, which I did.
24 Q What happened there?

25 A I drove out to the premises and we walked around and
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6916
Zerring-direct/White

1 he showed me the facility and what I viewed when I got
2 there was that there were sprinkler heads that had
3 discharged. Some of the sprinkler heads were on the
4 floor, there was some water on the floor and he started to
5 ask me questions and discuss the loss, what could I do for
6 him? How well could I do for him? So forth and so on,
7 and I told him at that point I really continue tell until
8 we got an adjuster assigned to the case from the insurance
9 company and I would call my office.
10 I had somebody in my office that handled that
11 function that was familiar with the insurance companies
12 and how they assigned losses and we ultimately, he
13 ultimately -- we were able to handpick the adjusters who
14 wanted to represent -- who were going to represent the
15 insurance company.
16 Q Why was it important to handpick those adjusters?
17 A Well, we wanted to have somebody, that, number one,
18 we had a prior relationship with, people that we paid off
19 in the past so we would be able to inflate the claim and
20 ultimately get a large settlement as possible.
21 Q How large did you inflate the claim that was
22 submitted?
23 A As I walked through the warehouse and viewed the
24 fact, I was told that a few sprinkler heads had
25 discharged. I was also told at that point that there were
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6917
Zerring-direct/White

1 many other sprinkler heads what he called or they called
2 leaky heads, they didn't actually discharge but just
3 leaking.
4 Q Can you explain what you mean by sprinkler heads in a

5 warehouse?
6 A A sprinkler system is basically there for if in the
7 event of a fire to basically limit the spread of that
8 fire, to contain it in the area where it started. And
9 that's what the function of a sprinkler system does.
10 Q What was the ostensible explanation as to why these
11 sprinkler heads had gone off in this warehouse?
12 A They said it was as a result of a freeze up.
13 Q Was there water damage below the water heads?
14 A Yes.
15 Q You were walking through the warehouse, continue.
16 A We were walking through the warehouse and I was
17 advised at that time there were three, four, five, six
18 sprinkler heads that actually discharged. Some of the
19 heads as I said were on the floor. I was told there were
20 other heads that were leaking that actually didn't
21 discharge and spray the water out.
22 So I suggested to the owner at th e time who I was
23 with that he call the plumber in, call the plumber back
24 and have him replace all of those leaky heads which may
25 have been another 20 or 30 heads, and the thing and the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6918
Zerring-direct/White

1 reason for this, this would give me a wider range of area
2 in order to make a larger claim because at that point the
3 insurance company's people were not there and they would
4 not have any idea of the scope of damage, you know. And
5 since this was a 50, 60,000, approximately, square foot
6 warehouse we then had a larger area to work with and a
7 larger area to inflate this claim.
8 THE COURT: How far would fixing leaky sprinkler
9 heads enlarge the claim?
10 THE WITNESS: Because the actual damage sustained
11 from the actual heads that went off were basically in a
12 square foot area. By replacing sprinkler heads at the
13 other portions of the aisles of the warehouse would
14 basically, to the insurance company's representative,
15 believe there were damages there that would not --
16 THE COURT: The replacement would be to pretend
17 they were leaking or discharged?
18 THE WITNESS: That's correct.
19 BY MR. WHITE:
20 Q In a normal circumstance when a sprinkler system goes
21 off, the heads need to be replaced because they have
22 discharged?
23 A Yes.
24 Q If an insurance adjuster came in and saw this, they
25 saw new heads?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6919
Zerring-direct/White

1 A Yes.
2 Q So you wanted to replace more?
3 A Yes.
4 Q And therefore the merchandise underneath them would
5 also theoretically potentially have been damaged?
6 A That's correct. They would be part of my claim.
7 Q Now, was a claim submitted to AIG regarding this
8 loss?
9 A Yes, it was.
10 Q And can you give us -- what else besides inflating
11 the inventory did you do in connection with that claim?
12 A Well, the process of preparing the claim was as
13 follows: We had several meetings, because it was quite a
14 large claim, we had several meetings with the insurance
15 company's representatives.
16 The first meeting which occurred that afternoon
17 was with an adjuster and because of the size of the claim
18 the way it was reported, he called in another adjuster to
19 co-adjust with him as well as the fact that I heard that
20 one of the adjusters, one of the senior guys was going to
21 be retiring. That's the fellow that was initially called
22 in. And I had told my -- one of my employees, my adjuster
23 when I heard that to see if he could assign another
24 adjuster in the case in the event that he was leaving to
25 co-adjust this with him, so that we had all the right
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6920
Zerring-direct/White

1 people in place to handle this loss.
2 Q Did you bribe any insurance company representatives
3 in connection with this claim?
4 A Yes, I did.
5 Q Who?
6 A Jeff Fougere.
7 Q And who is he?
8 A He was a general adjuster representing the National
9 Union Insurance Company which is part of the AIG Group.
10 Q How much did you pay that insurance company adjuster?
11 A Oh, somewhere around 75 to $100,000 in United States
12 currency.
13 Q Now, can you give us an estimate of the actual
14 damages that were sustained by Rafella Sportswear?
15 A In my opinion, when I first viewed the premises and
16 walked ar ound with the owner, it was my opinion that there
17 could have been probably or approximately $2,000,000 in
18 damages, could have been a little more, a little less,
19 that was just an eyeball.
20 Q Is that physical damage?
21 A That's physical damage. Meaning that was the actual
22 damage sustained to the garments itself.
23 Q Did the policy cover any other sorts of damages?
24 A Yes, it did. It covered something called, which was
25 provided in the insurance policy, consequential loss
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6921
Zerring-direct/White

1 coverage.
2 Q And can you tell us just in summary in laymans terms
3 what that means?
4 A Yes. That's a coverage that provides for a loss of
5 value to the undamaged portion of the property of the
6 garments, such if there was a lady's suit and the physical
7 damage hit the jacket, the pants were not damaged, but it
8 would have an effect on the loss of value.
9 There would be a loss of value if sold to a
10 department store what have you, as well as broken sizes,
11 lots and colors, meaning if sizes 2 and 4 were damaged,
12 that the rest of the lot or the rest of that range of
13 merchandise would lose value.
14 Q Now, adding in both of those kinds of damages, can
15 you give us a rough idea what the approximate losses
16 sustained by Rafella was?
17 A The consequential loss area wasn't really my forte.
18 I had an in-house CPA that handled that area and he worked
19 on that portion of the claim, but I would say my best
20 guess that as a result the consequential could have been a
21 couple million, possibly.
22 Q So that would make the total damage at 5 or
23 6,000,000, approximately?
24 A At most.
25 Q Can you tell u s how much the insurance company
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6922
Zerring-direct/White

1 eventually paid on this claim to Rafella?
2 A In excess of $19,000,000.
3 Q And can you tell us how much did your firm Interstate
4 Adjusters get from that claim?
5 A We received a fee of probably close to $3,000,000.
6 Q And what was your share of that $3,000,000?
7 A Well, I was a 50 percent owner of the company, so
8 that money went into the corporation into our company
9 account.
10 Q And did you receive any cash as a result of your
11 participation in the Rafella claim?
12 A Yes. Over a period of time we told the insured or
13 the policyholder we needed cash and over a period of time
14 he gave us, and we asked him, about a half million in
15 cash.
16 Q After you paid bribes to various people, how much did
17 you r firm pertain in cash?
18 A We retained approximately $300,000 for myself and my
19 company.
20 Q Were you involved in a fraudulent claim involving a
21 policyholder named Criterion Bead?
22 A Yes, I was.
23 Q What was Criterion Bead?
24 A They were an importer of novelty merchandise from
25 overseas, the Far East, I guess.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6923
Zerring-direct/White

1 Q Approximately when did they sustain a loss?
2 A I believe it was around April of 1991.
3 Q And where did they sustain this loss?
4 A At their warehouse facility in Woodside, Queens.
5 Q What sort of loss did they sustain?
6 A Well, the proximate cause of loss was fire, meaning
7 that the loss resulted as a fire. The fire started
8 outside their building on some wood pallets and
9 communicated into the building, thus causing spr inkler
10 heads to discharge.
11 Q And did they have an insurance policy covering that
12 kind of loss?
13 A Yes, they did.
14 Q With what insurance company?
15 A With the Chubb Insurance Group, Chubb Insurance
16 Company.
17 Q That's C-H-U-B-B, right?
18 A Yes.
19 Q Were you retained as a public adjuster for Criterion
20 Bead?
21 A Yes, I was.
22 Q Did you inflate that claim?
23 A Grossly inflated.
24 Q Tell us again in summary how you did that.
25 A Well, as I stated, the fire occurred adjacent to the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6924
Zerring-direct/White

1 building, I guess the heat and the fire communicated into
2 the building causing a couple sprinkler heads to activate,
3 discharge, maybe one, two, or three, approximately. What
4 we did was ultimately we did a physical inve ntory of the
5 entire premises and stated that there was smoke throughout
6 the premises.
7 Q When there was not?
8 A When there was not.
9 Q Did you bribe any insurance company representatives
10 in connection with this claim?
11 A Well, in this particular case my partner was friendly
12 and bribed the adjuster who was representing the Chubb
13 people.
14 Q Can you give us, again, a rough estimate what the
15 actual damages sustained by Criterion Bead was?
16 A My best guess was, 100, $200,000.
17 Q Can you tell us approximately the insurance company
18 paid in this claim to Criterion Bead?
19 A In excess of $16,000,000.
20 Q What was your adjusting firm's share of that payout?
21 A The nature of the business was such where since they
22 were importers they really did not have any cash. So all
23 of my entire fee was by check. I would say r oughly we
24 received a fee, I would approximate, somewhere between 3
25 and $400,000 or upwards.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6925
Zerring-direct/White

1 Q Mr. Zerring, did there come a time when federal
2 agents executed a search warrant at the offices of your
3 adjusting firm?
4 A Yes.
5 Q Can you tell us when that was?
6 A December 9, 1992.
7 Q And were you arrested at that time?
8 A No, I was not.
9 Q Now, after that search warrant, did you obtain an
10 attorney?
11 A Yes, I did.
12 Q Now, after you obtained an attorney, what did you do?
13 A I met with my attorney and shortly after that
14 approximately December 29, 1992, we voluntarily went into
15 the U.S. Attorney's Office and at that point we did what
16 we called a proffer. We started to give over all of the
17 information, all of the wrongdoings --
18 THE COURT: Do you want to pull the mike closer
19 to you, please.
20 THE WITNESS: Yes.
21 A We proffered, December 29, 1992, shortly after the
22 holidays, we came in voluntarily to meet with the U.S.
23 Attorney's Office. We met with two U.S. Assistant
24 Attorneys and an agent of the FBI, Inspector Biegelman,
25 and my attorney was present and we at the time started
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6926
Zerring-direct/White

1 what they call a proffer. We started to give information,
2 all the information of all the wrongdoings and all the
3 fraudulent schemes and what have you over to the
4 government.
5 Q Now, did you agree to cooperate with the government?
6 A Yes, I did.
7 Q And did you eventually sign a cooperation agreement?
8 A Yes, I did.
9 Q And when was that?
10 A That was approximately April of 1993.
11 Q Now, did you eventually plead guilty?
12 A Yes, I did.
13 Q When was that?
14 A That was in August of 1993.
15 Q Can you tell us what you pled guilty to?
16 A Yes. I pled guilty to two counts of mail fraud and
17 one count of income tax evasion.
18 Q And what do the two counts of mail fraud or what did
19 the two counts of mail fraud you pled guilty to relate to?
20 A One was the Rafella Sportswear claim and one was the
21 Criterion Bead claim.
22 Q And can you tell us what the tax charge you pled
23 guilty to related to?
24 A To the Rafella Sportswear claim.
25 Q Now, are you testifying here today as part of your
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6927
Zerring-direct/White

1 agreement with the government?
2 A Yes, I am.
3 Q Tell us what your understanding is o f what you have
4 to do under that agreement?
5 A To tell the truth. To be truthful with the
6 government. To tell the truth. To give full cooperation
7 to them. To go undercover, if need be. To be debriefed,
8 to work with the Internal Revenue Service, to pay back all
9 the taxes during the period of 1990, December 1990 that I
10 understated.
11 Q What's your understanding of what the government has
12 agreed to do if you fully cooperate?
13 A Well, if I fully cooperate and I give substantial
14 assistance, what have you, they can then at that point
15 depart from the original guidelines, I guess, and
16 recommend or write what they call a 5K letter to the
17 Judge.
18 Q And if the government writes its 5K letter, what is
19 your understanding what the Judge can do?
20 A Well, he could depart from the original guidelines.
21 Q Now, have you been sen tenced yet?
22 A No, I have not.
23 Q Can you tell us what's your understanding of what the
24 maximum sentence you could face is?
25 A Five years per count, $250,000 fine per count, court
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6928
Zerring-direct/White

1 costs, restitution.
2 Q In terms of the jail sentence, could your sentences
3 be consecutive? What's the total amount of time you could
4 face?
5 A Fifteen years.
6 Q Now, have you repaid the IRS the taxes that you
7 evaded?
8 A Yes, I have.
9 Q Have you received any promises from the government
10 about what sentence you will receive?
11 A None whatsoever.
12 Q Have you received any promises from anyone about what
13 sentence you will receive?
14 A No.
15 Q Can you tell us who will ultimately determines what
16 your sentence will be?

17 A The Honorable Judge Wexler.
18 Q And let me draw your attention to late 1994.
19 At that time were you cooperating with the
20 government?
21 A Yes, I was.
22 Q And did you assist postal inspectors in connection
23 with an investigation of Who's Who Worldwide around that
24 time?
25 A Yes, I did.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6929
Zerring-direct/White

1 Q Can you tell us what you were asked to do at that
2 time?
3 A Yes. I was asked to, from a local newspaper, I was
4 asked to call and set up an interview with the Who's Who
5 Worldwide people, which I did. And I set up an
6 appointment. At that time I spoke to one of the people
7 from Who's Who and they advised me -- they asked me what I
8 did. They basically said to me that you need about one
9 year experience and I told them that I had no exper ience
10 in that field and I advised them that I was in the
11 insurance field and I was basically in sales and they said
12 that would be fine.
13 Q And what sort of position were you applying for
14 there?
15 A For a sales position in telemarketing.
16 Q Who asked you, who from the postal inspectors asked
17 you to do this?
18 A Inspector Biegelman.
19 Q Did you receive any instructions from the postal
20 inspectors regarding what you were to do once you got a
21 job there?
22 A Yeah. Basically to be wearing a concealed
23 tape-recorder and I should tape, do my tape-recordings
24 throughout the day, the full day while working there. And
25 also to follow whatever, while working there, what was the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6930
Zerring-direct/White

1 norm in their day-to-day operation. Reading the scr ipts,
2 including whatever was the norm in their business.
3 Q Did you eventually go to work there?
4 A Yes, I did.
5 Q When was that?
6 A Well, I first had -- I first had an interview
7 approximately on November 28, 1994, with Ed Schaveffer. I
8 met with him for a short time, approximately 20 minutes,
9 and he gave me an overview of what the business was
10 about. He also gave me some materials to take home to
11 review and said to me that I could start on December 6th,
12 which I did.
13 Q And what office did you work in?
14 A The Lake Success office.
15 Q Now, did you record what took place while you worked
16 there?
17 A Yes, I did.
18 Q And what did you do with the tapes that you made?
19 A I turned them over to Inspector Biegelman.
20 Q If you could briefly take a look at Exhibits 13-87
21 through 14-03 (handing.)
22 A 13-87, to where? I'm sorry.
23 Q To the end of the book. Please page through it, if
24 you could.
25 A Okay. (Perusing.)
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6931
Zerring-direct/White

1 Q Mr. Zerring, let me stop you there.
2 In addition to paging through them there, have
3 you had an opportunity to review those transcripts and the
4 corresponding tape-recordings prior to the trial?
5 A Yes.
6 Q And the ones you've looked through, are those a
7 portion of the tape-recordings you've made while you were
8 employed at Who's Who Worldwide?
9 A Just a portion of them, yes.
10 Q While you were at Who's Who Worldwide, were you given
11 a name to use on the phone with customers?
12 A Yes, I was.
13 Q What was that?
14 A Elliot Zale, Z-A-L-E.
15 Q Who gave you that name?
16 A I believe it was one of the managers, Ed Schaveffer,
17 Tara Green or Frank Martin. I believe one of them.
18 Q How long did you work at Who's Who Worldwide?
19 A From, I started working there, as I said, December
20 6th, and I was terminated I believe it was February 15th.
21 Q Of what year?
22 A 1995.
23 Q So approximately how many weeks did you work there?
24 A I think it was roughly 10 to 12 weeks.
25 Q And what were the circumstances of your termination?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6932
Zerring-direct/White

1 A Lack of production.
2 Q Did you receive paychecks from Who's Who Worldwide
3 while you were employed there?
4 A I believe I did receive some paychecks.
5 Q Did you cash these paychecks?
6 A No, I did not.
7 Q What did you do with them?
8 A I turned them over to Inspector Biegelman.
9 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, if I c ould just have a
10 moment?
11 THE COURT: Yes.
12 (Counsel confer.)
13 BY MR. WHITE:
14 Q Now, Mr. Zerring, in your guilty plea have you taken
15 any steps to assist the insurance companies that you
16 defrauded in recovering the monies that they paid out?
17 A Yes, I have.
18 Q And could you tell us, please, what you've done?
19 A I've testified on their behalf, on behalf of the
20 insurance companies to recover those monies.
21 Q In what sort of proceedings have you testified?
22 A I testified under oath, you know, before the
23 insurance companies and the insurance companies'
24 representatives.
25 Q Was that in a deposition?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6933
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A That was in a deposition, yes.
2 Q Who was that lawsuit against?
3 A That lawsuit was against Rafella S portswear.
4 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, I have no further
5 questions.
6 THE COURT: Cross-examination.
7 CROSS-EXAMINATION
8 BY MR. NELSON: /(.
9 Q Good afternoon, Mr. Zerring.
10 Let me ask you something. Have you spent a
11 single minute in jail?
12 A No, sir.
13 Q You pled guilty to three felony charges, right?
14 A Correct.
15 Q That was in 1993; is that right?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And in the past five years after ripping off all of
18 these companies for millions of dollars, you still haven't
19 spent a single minute in jail; is that right?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Now, two of the charges involved mail fraud; is that
22 correct?
23 A Yes.
24 Q One of the charges was filing false income tax
25 returns, correct?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6934
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Yes.
2 Q Now, when you pled guilty it was on August 26, 1993,
3 right?
4 A August of 1993.
5 Q Am I correct that the first felony charge of mail
6 fraud concerns your participation in a scheme whereby
7 water damage to Rafella Sportswear was overstated it as a
8 subsidiary of the AIG Insurance Company?
9 A Yes.
10 Q And you were employed at that time as a public
11 adjuster working for the various different claimants, but
12 you would submit the claims to the insurance carriers; is
13 that correct?
14 A Yes.
15 Q And I believe you said after an inspection of the
16 premises and your bribery of a number of different
17 individuals, the total claim for water damage to those
18 premises amounted to 19.5 million; is that correct?
19 A Approximately, that's correct.
20 Q And the total damage was approximately $4,000,000, at
21 best?

22 A Approximately.
23 Q And AIG issued a check in excess of 10.5 million
24 promised upon this fraudulently overstated claim; is that
25 correct?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6935
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Partially.
2 Q Now, this crime was committed by you in 1990; is that
3 right? Rafella Sportswear.
4 A When the loss occurred.
5 Q The loss occurred in 1990; is that right?
6 A Somewhere around '89, '90, correct.
7 Q The second felony of mail fraud, that relates to your
8 participation in 1991 in this claim against Chubb
9 Insurance Company; is that correct?
10 A Yes.
11 Q And in that one you assisted in the filing of a claim
12 where you falsely overstated water damage to Criterion
13 Bead & Novelty Company?
14 A That's correct.
15 Q And that claim was for $16,000,000, right?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And the loss was about $400,000; is that right?
18 A I don't know if it was that much.
19 Q Two or 300,000, actually?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Now, your third felony charge concerns your filing of
22 a false income tax return for 1990; is that right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q Now, am I correct that in 1978, you and an individual
25 by the name of Robert Greenberg, established and became
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6936
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 equal partners in a company called Interstate Adjusting
2 Corporation?
3 A That's correct.
4 Q You were both 50/50 partners in that company; is that
5 right?
6 A Yes.
7 Q And as you explained, when Mr. White was questioning
8 you, you would review losses caused as a result of fire or
9 water damage or other kind of occurrence for presentation
10 of claims to i nsurance companies, right?
11 A Yes.
12 Q And the insurance companies relied upon you to
13 accurately apprise them of the claims of damages for
14 losses?
15 A Could you repeat that, please?
16 Q The insurance companies were relying upon you to
17 provide accurate information for them to evaluate the
18 claims for payment of insurance; is that right?
19 A I guess the policyholders were relying on me to
20 present proper claims.
21 Q Let's take them one at a time.
22 You worked for the policyholder, right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q The policyholders weren't relying upon you to provide
25 accurate claims, they were hiring you for your connections
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6937
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 with the insurance companies so you could rip off the
2 insurance companies, right?
3 A Some were and some w ere not.
4 Q A great number of people came to you between 1978 and
5 1992 when you were finally caught for the specific purpose
6 of your connections with insurance carriers so that they
7 could acquire money for losses that grossly overstated the
8 amount of loss they had acquiFF0000; is that right?
9 A Some yes; some not.
10 Q Let's go to the other side of the coin.
11 You were licensed by the State of New York; is
12 that right?
13 A Yes.
14 Q And the State of New York, when they gave you that
15 license, expected that you were going to be providing
16 accurate and truthful information to the insurance
17 companies; is that right?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And the insurance companies were relying upon you as
20 a licensed public adjuster to provide accurate and
21 truthful information to them for the purpose of processing
22 of these claims; is that ri ght?
23 A Yes.
24 Q Now, obviously you violated the trust of the State of
25 New York in your license and all of the insurance
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6938
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 companies you ripped off; is that right?
2 A Yes.
3 Q Am I correct you actually never assisted any of your
4 clients in staging any claims? You didn't burn down
5 buildings yourself. You are not an arsonist, right?
6 A That's correct.
7 Q You were, however, aware as it relates to Rafella
8 Sportswear, your first felon conviction of mail fraud,
9 that the insured parties, your clients, the owners of the
10 premises, were going to stage a claim. Were going to
11 cause intentional damage to that premises before it ever
12 took place; isn't that right?
13 A Yes and no.
14 Q Yes and no.
15 You testified before a federal g rand jury, did
16 you not?
17 A Yes.
18 Q I would like to direct your attention to 3500-23-LLL,
19 pages 26 and 27.
20 Do you recall having giis testimony on July
21 13, 1993 under questioning by an Assistant United States
22 Attorney by the name of Mark Kirsch, K-I-R-S-C-H, starting
23 on line 13.
24 "Question: So, again, what did you understand
25 all this was leading up to?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6939
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 "Answer: To me it was leading up to that there
2 was going to be, it seemed certain, there was going to be
3 a loss occurring.
4 "Question: After that, at your home, will you
5 describe yourself as comfortable or uncomfortable?
6 "Answer: I was very uncomfortable because of my
7 20 some-odd years in the business. It is uncomfortable
8 for me to have knowledge pri or to an actual loss
9 occurring.
10 "Question: It is uncomfortable for you to have
11 knowledge or for other people to know you have knowledge?
12 "Answer: Both.
13 "Question: Now, the loss of Rafella was reported
14 to you on or about December 21, 1989; is that correct?
15 "Answer: Yes."
16 Do you recall being asked those questions and
17 giving those answers in relation to the loss at Rafella
18 Sportswear before a federal grand jury on July 13, 1993?
19 A Yes.
20 Q So am I correct, sir, that in fact you were well
21 aware before the loss actually occurred that in fact your
22 clients, the owners of those premises were going to stage
23 a loss before it took place?
24 A It seemed that way to me.
25 Q But you swore under oath before a federal grand jury
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6940
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 that you knew it in advance; is that right?
2 A I believe that I said that it seemed like it was
3 leading up to that.
4 Q Gee, maybe I should read it through again. "To me it
5 was leading up to that. It seemed certain there was going
6 to be a loss occurring."
7 Do you recall giving that testimony?
8 A Yes.
9 Q That means that there was going to be a loss, and you
10 knew there was going to be a loss before it happened;
11 isn't that right, sir?
12 A Yes, that's what it seemed like to me, correct.
13 Q And you agreed to participate in later filing a claim
14 for them knowing that they had intentionally caused the
15 damage at Rafella Sportswear; isn't that right?
16 A Yes, I did file the claim later.
17 Q And that was with knowledge that it seemed certain
18 that before the loss occurred that they were going to be
19 filing this clai m; is that right?
20 A It seemed that way.
21 Q Now, am I correct you were involved in inflating many
22 claims for damage, in addition to the two that you pled
23 guilty to; is that right?
24 A Yes.
25 Q Am I correct that what you would do is you would take
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6941
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 back money, in other words, give bribes to various
2 different insurance brokers -- excuse me, claims
3 adjusters, that you had created a relationship with over
4 the years that you had been a public adjuster; is that
5 right?
6 A Yes.
7 Q And what you would do is over the course of time, you
8 found people who were weak and susceptible and were
9 prepared to pay cash under the table in order to allow you
10 for them to be paying clients for grossly inflated claims;
11 is that right?
12 A I don't understand that question.
13 Q Let's break them down one part at a time.
14 You received a contingency fee for the work you
15 did?
16 A Yes.
17 Q The more you did, the more of a claim you got?
18 A Yes.
19 Q Over the course of claim, you, when you first started
20 in business as a licensed adjuster, licensed and bonded in
21 the state of New York, you were honest and scrupulous in
22 your business; is that right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q During the course of time you eventually started
25 forming a relationship with various different employees of
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6942
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 insurance companies, right?
2 A Yes, but I have to retract a prior statement when you
3 mentioned when I started going into business. Prior to
4 going into business I was employed by someone else and I

5 was at that time fraudulently putting together as well.
6 Q So before 1978, somebody else had taught you the
7 business; is that right?
8 A Basically.
9 Q They had taught you how to rip off insurance
10 companies going back to before '78?
11 A Yes.
12 Q They started to introduce you to different insurance
13 company employees who were prepared to take money under
14 the table to look the other way when grossly inflated
15 claims were presented; is that right?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And so when you went into business, you were going
18 into business initially under the intention of defrauding
19 insurance companies; is that right?
20 A Not in its entirety, but yes, true.
21 Q From 1978 up to the execution of a search warrant in
22 1992, you were regularly and actively in the business of
23 defrauding insurance companies; is that right?
24 A Ye s and no.
25 Q Well, some claims were honest, some weren't, right?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6943
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A That's exactly what I'm saying.
2 Q Rafella Sportswear, that is one of the many that
3 wasn't; is that right?
4 A Yes.
5 Q Now, you indicated that the way things were is that
6 since you were on a contingency, the client would receive
7 a greater sum of money for the grossly -- for an inflated
8 claim and likewise you would receive a percentage of that
9 inflated claim, right?
10 A Can you repeat that back to me?
11 Q Right.
12 You were on a contingency basis?
13 A Yes.
14 Q And on a contingency basis if a $9,000,000 loss
15 actually became $19,000,000, if you were receiving 10
16 percent, obviously you received a much greater commission
17 on it; is that right?
18 A Yes.
19 Q And the greater the inflation of the claim the
20 greater the commission you would receive; is that right?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And am I correct that you were in a pool with a
23 number of other people who inflated these claims as well?
24 A Yes.
25 Q And there were a number of different public adjusters
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6944
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 who you worked with and who worked with these crooked
2 insurance employees in order to create this pool where
3 various different clients would come to all of you and all
4 of this kickback money would wind up going into a large
5 pool; is that right?
6 A More or less, yes.
7 Q Am I correct that what the pool reflected is the
8 money which was the difference between the actual loss and
9 the amount that was paid, less any bribes?
10 A I don't understand that.
11 Q But what the pool consisted of was the difference
12 between the amount of commission you received for the
13 grossly inflated claim, less what the actual loss would
14 be; is that correct?
15 A No, I don't believe that you have that right.
16 Q Okay. Let's break it down then.
17 Let's say that you have a $10,000,000 loss,
18 okay.
19 A Okay.
20 Q The true loss is $1,000,000, okay.
21 A Yes.
22 Q Your commission for that would be $1,000,000 if it
23 was 10 percent, correct?
24 A Yes.
25 Q And the $1,000,000 would go into a pool. Is that the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6945
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 way it worked?
2 A No.
3 Q What amount would go into the pool?
4 A The amount, in addition to the fee you just stated,
5 we would ask or tell the policyholder we n eeded X-amount
6 in order to receive that $1,000,000 and that amount of
7 money that we received in cash, part of that would go off
8 to pay the people and the balance that didn't go off to
9 pay the people would be retained in my own office which
10 was part of our pool.
11 Q So would your pool consist of less than a million or
12 more than a million?
13 A I don't understand the question.
14 Q You are getting 1,000,000 commission?
15 A The figure is $1,000,000.
16 Q Right.
17 And it should be a $100,000 fee, right?
18 A Right.
19 Q So you are getting $900,000 in unlawful money from
20 ripping off the insurance company, right?
21 A Yes.
22 Q Okay.
23 In addition to that you are receiving other
24 monies as well, is that what you are telling me?
25 A That's what I'm saying.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORT ER
6946
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q Was that other money you receive on top of the 900
2 grand that you are getting?
3 A That's the money I stated is cash to use to bribe
4 people to pay them off in order to be able to get that
5 $10,000,000 loss paid for, or $1,000,000 loss.
6 Q So you wouldn't reach into your own pocket to pay off
7 the bribe, you had your client pay the bribe so it
8 wouldn't interfere with the amount of money in your pool,
9 right?
10 A I can't answer that question yes or no.
11 Q Now, am I correct that between 1990 and 1992, you
12 received 30 percent of this total pool? That was your
13 percentage of the pool?
14 A I believe that's approximately correct.
15 Q And between 1988 and 1990, you received 32 and-a-half
16 percent of the pooling?
17 A Yes.
18 Q Now, the total pool or the total amount that went

19 into there each year, as best as you could recall, is how
20 much money between those years?
21 A Well --
22 Q I'll withdraw the question.
23 Am I correct that your share of the pool in 1991
24 and 1992 was computed by the government after your proffer
25 sessions with them to come out to about $37,500 per year?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6947
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A I believe what you are talking about is something
2 that occurred over a five or six-year period on average.
3 Q Right.
4 A Okay.
5 Q Do you recall that it was computed as about $37,500
6 per year in 1991 and 1992?
7 A No, it was more. One of those years was more.
8 Q We'll get to that year in a moment, the Rafella
9 Sportswear.
10 In '91 and '92, was it about 37,500?
11 A That was probably an average, yes.
12 Q In 1989, was it about 40,000?
13 A Again, it was an approximate average.
14 Q And in '86-'87, a little bit earlier on, it was about
15 30,000 per year; is that right?
16 A Without seeing the paperwork, you know, just
17 estimating what I said, you know, that was an average.
18 Q In 1990, am I correct, and that's the Rafella
19 Sportswear year --
20 A Right.
21 Q -- Your share was considerably greater; isn't that
22 right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q In that year, am I correct, it includes the Rafella
25 Sportswear loss where you were aware that the insurance
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6948
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 company, that the insured was going to stage the loss
2 before it occurred, right?
3 A What is the question?
4 Q The question is that the year you received a greater
5 sum of money, 1990, that's the year of the Raf ella
6 Sportswear loss; is that right?
7 A Yes.
8 Q And the Rafella Sportswear loss, that's the one where
9 you previously told us you were aware that the client was
10 going to stage the loss before it took place; is that
11 right?
12 A That's what I said before.
13 Q And your share that you received in 1990 from the
14 pool, was $90,000 in cash; is that right?
15 A Approximately, right.
16 Q And in fact, almost all of the money that you
17 received throughout this period of time from the pool was
18 in cash; isn't that right?
19 A Repeat that, please?
20 Q Almost all of the money that you received out of the
21 pool was in cash; isn't that right?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And so you received in cash from say 1986 up to 1992
24 3 or 400,000 in cash; isn't that right?
25 A How do you compute that?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIA L COURT REPORTER
6949
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q Let's go through it one year at a time.
2 THE COURT: I'll tell you we'll go through it
3 after lunch.
4 MR. NELSON: Okay.
5 THE COURT: Members of the jury, let's take a
6 recess now.
7 Don't discuss the case. Keep an open mind.
8 We'll recess until 1:30.
9 (Luncheon recess taken.)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6950
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A F T E R N O O N S E S S I O N.
2 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, we have a customer who is
3 here to testify today. She wasn't here and ready to go
4 previously.
5 THE COURT: Where is she from?
6 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, she is from the Bronx,

7 but I just wondered if we could reach an appropriate time
8 today.
9 THE COURT: Well, put her on now.
10 MR. WHITE: That's okay with me. I wanted to
11 make sure it was okay with Mr. Nelson.
12 MR. NELSON: That's okay.
13 THE COURT: It gives him more time to think about
14 his cross-examination. I wish I had those opportunities.
15 Let's get rid of him or her.
16 MR. WHITE: Her, Judge.
17 THE COURT: I don't mean anything terrible by
18 that.
19 (Jury enters.)
20 THE COURT: Please be seated, members of the
21 jury.
22 Again we are interrupting the testimony of the
23 last witness, Mr. Zerring, to put on another witness.
24 You may proceed.
25 MS. SCOTT: Thank you, Your Honor.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6951
Walton-direct/Scott

1 The government calls Madeline Walton.
2 M A D E L I N E L. W A L T O N , having been first
3 duly sworn by the Clerk of the Court, was examined and
4 testified as follows:
5 THE WITNESS: Madeline L. Walton, W-A-L-T-O-N.
6 THE COURT: Have a seat, Ms. Walton.
7 DIRECT EXAMINATION
8 BY MS. SCOTT:
9 Q Good afternoon, Ms. Walton.
10 A Good afternoon.
11 Q Can you tell us where you live?
12 A I live in the Bronx, New York, 55 Caldwell Avenue.
13 Q What do you do?
14 A I'm an assistant director and a program coordinator
15 of a senior citizen program.
16 MS. SCOTT: I think that the mike may not be on.
17 THE COURT: Okay. All right.
18 BY MS. SCOTT:
19 Q You said you are an assistant director of a senior
20 center?
21 A Of a senior citizens center.
22 Q Can you tell us the name of the center?
23 A Douglas Leon Senior Center.
24 Q What kind of center is the Dougla s Leon Senior
25 Center?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6952
Walton-direct/Scott

1 A Douglas Leon Senior Center, we are under the
2 department for the aging, we were under a sponsor which is
3 Hunts Point Service. The Department of the Aging pays for
4 our salary, but our sponsor, we are responsible to them
5 for the running of our program.
6 Q As the assistant director of this center, what are
7 your responsibilities?
8 A My duties are day-to-day running of the center which
9 includes the cook, the maintenance men, the outreach
10 person, all the activities that take place on the grounds
11 of the center.
12 I do case management. I do outreach for the
13 seniors.
14 Q And when you say "case management," what do you mean
15 by that?
16 A Case management, that if seniors have problems,
17 irregardles s what they pertain to, I assist them with
18 their problems, such as working with the Department of
19 Social Services, working with Social Security, working
20 with hospitals, working with MTA for half fare passes,
21 working with their primary care doctor.
22 Q How long have you been doing this with the Douglas
23 Leon Senior Center?
24 A Eleven years. This will be 12 years.
25 Q How many people do you supervise in your position?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6953
Walton-direct/Scott

1 A I have three people that I supervise because we have
2 a small staff. But we have an attendance of seniors of
3 135, 140 on a daily basis.
4 Q Now, have you had any dealings with a company called
5 Who's Who Worldwide?
6 A Yes, I did.
7 Q Did you eventually make a purchase from that company?
8 A Yes, I did.
9 Q And can y ou tell us approximately when you first were
10 contacted by this company?
11 A In November of 1992.
12 Q How were you contacted?
13 A Through the telephone and through a letter.
14 Q Now, turning your attention to the letter. Can you
15 tell us what that letter said?
16 A The letter informed me that I was nominated for Who's
17 Who Worldwide.
18 Q And was there anything enclosed with that letter?
19 Did you fill out anything?
20 A Yes, I filled out a card.
21 Q I'm showing you Government's Exhibit 5-D, for Daniel,
22 which is in evidence.
23 Is that the form you filled out and returned to
24 Who's Who Worldwide?
25 A Yes, this is my handwriting and this is the form.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6954
Walton-direct/Scott

1 Q Now, if you flip that over, do you see a postmark on
2 that other side?

3 A November 30, 1992.
4 Q And if you flip it back over with the side of your
5 handwriting on it and look in the lower right-hand corner,
6 do you see a code there?
7 A GA Group L.
8 Q GA Group L, as in Leon; is that correct?
9 A Yes.
10 Q Turning your attention to the telephone call. Can
11 you tell us whether you spoke to a man or woman?
12 A I spoke to a man.
13 Q Can you tell us what, if anything, happened when you
14 spoke to him?
15 A Well, when I spoke to the man he was telling me I was
16 nominated to be included in the Who's Who Registry and in
17 order to do that they needed my credit card. So I told
18 them that they had to send me the information through the
19 mail and then I would, you know, proceed after that.
20 Q Now, did you eventually have a conversation with
21 somebody who told you about the company and about the

22 memberships -- withdrawn.
23 Did you eventually make a purchase over the
24 telephone?
25 A After I got the information through the mail, I sent
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6955
Walton-direct/Scott

1 a card back and then they called me and I gave them my
2 credit card number.
3 Q Now, did you have a conversation with the person
4 about the memberships?
5 A Yes, but I wasn't aware it was a membership. It was
6 supposed to be a nomination to be included in Who's Who.
7 I didn't hear anything about membership at that time.
8 Q But you discussed with the person what you had to do
9 to be included in the book; is that correct?
10 A Yes. He told me that to be included in the book --
11 no. What he told me was that I would get a plaque, a
12 registry, a Who's Who Registry and a credit card.
13 Q And what, if anything, did he tell you about how the
14 company selected people to put them in the book?
15 A He told me that they go through various colleges and
16 that's how the selected process was.
17 Q How were they selected?
18 A I assumed that they were selected through status of
19 your college like your grade point average or achievements
20 you had made while you were in college.
21 MR. SCHOER: Objection to what she assumes.
22 THE COURT: Objection sustained. Motion
23 granted. Strike out everything starting with "I
24 assumed." The jury is instructed to disregard it.
25 MS. SCOTT: Okay, I'll move on.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6956
Walton-direct/Scott

1 BY MS. SCOTT:
2 Q What, if anything, were you told about how the other
3 people in the book would be notified once you joined?
4 A Could you please rephrase that?

5 Q What, if anything, did they tell you about how the
6 other people whose names were in the book would be
7 notified once you joined the company?
8 A Well, they said they would do press releases. I
9 guess that's how they would tell the other people.
10 Q Now, the things that were said -- well, going back.
11 Did you agree to pay money to this company?
12 A I agreed to pay money for a plaque, the credit card
13 and the registry.
14 Q And of the things that they told you about this
15 company, what was the most important thing that lead you
16 to make this purchase?
17 A Well, I hate to say I thought, but I was in a Who's
18 Who in undergraduate school and I thought this was a
19 spin-off from a little Who's Who to a Worldwide and I
20 joined it for status reasons.
21 Q When you say you joined it for status reasons, what
22 do you mean?
23 A I belo ng to a lot of organizations and I figured it
24 would look good on my resume, when I did my resume, they
25 see Who's Who in undergraduate. When I finished graduate
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6957
Walton-direct/Scott

1 school, I figured well maybe somebody gave me name and now
2 I'm going to another level which will be international,
3 you know, global.
4 Q How, if at all, did you hope to use this purchase
5 that you made?
6 A For networking purposes.
7 Q When you say "networking," what do you mean?
8 A I figured they would have different agencies where I
9 could get in touch with certain people doing the type of
10 work that I do. Maybe they would be instrumental in
11 helping me or giving me some insight into other agencies I
12 didn't know about as far as dealing with seniors or the
13 community as a whole.
1 4 Q If your name had been taken from a mailing list
15 rather than nomination, would you still have purchased?
16 A No.
17 Q Why is that?
18 A Because I don't have to pay money to join a
19 membership.
20 Q What, if anything -- withdrawn.
21 What would have been the effect in your mind of
22 your name coming from a mailing list?
23 MR. LEE: Objection.
24 THE COURT: Sustained.
25 BY MS. SCOTT:
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6958
Walton-direct/Scott

1 Q Why is it that you would not have made this purchase
2 if your name was taken from a mailing list?
3 A Mailing is not valid. A person could be dead or
4 homeless, and that is no special need for a person to pay
5 to join a membership if your name comes off a mailing
6 list. That's how people get junk mail through the mailing
7 list and I don't send mon ey through a mailing list,
8 because I don't like mailing lists.
9 Q When you made your purchase from the company, how did
10 you pay for it?
11 A I paid with my credit card.
12 Q How did you give your credit card to the company?
13 A I gave it to them over the telephone.
14 Q Now, I'm showing you Government's Exhibit 5-B, as in
15 Baker, which is in evidence (handing.)
16 Do you see your name on that document?
17 A Yes, I do.
18 Q And do you see a date, a couple of dates in the
19 right-hand corner?
20 A Yes.
21 Q What are the dates?
22 A For membership is 12/8 and the invoice date was
23 12/15.
24 Q Ms. Walton, did you receive a plaque?
25 A Yes, I did.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6959
Walton-direct/Scott

1 Q Can you tell us what happened when you received the
2 plaque?

3 A When I opened the box and saw the plaque my name was
4 spelled wrong and I told them that I was sending the
5 plaque back because my name was spelled wrong.
6 Q And did you ever receive a directory from the
7 company?
8 A No, I didn't.
9 Q And can you tell us what you did when you realized
10 that you had not received the directory?
11 A I called them back again and I asked them what
12 happened to the registry and the credit card that they
13 promised to send for the money that I had sent them.
14 Q And what response did you get?
15 A The response was that I had to send some more money
16 in order to get the directory. And I went off and I told
17 them that I was going to call the Better Business Bureau
18 and I was going to call Mark Green and report them.
19 Q Did you ever have any other contacts with the company
20 after that?
21 A One mor e time. When I called to ask them about the
22 registry again because I had sent my money and I didn't
23 think I needed a plaque for $200 and something when I have
24 plenty of plaques and this one wasn't even correct.
25 Q Ms. Walton, who is Mark Green?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6960
Walton-cross/Trabulus

1 A Mark Green is the public advocate for Manhattan, New
2 York City.
3 MS. SCOTT: Thank you. I have no further
4 questions.
5 I would like to publish the exhibits, Your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 MS. SCOTT: 5-B and 5-D.
8 CROSS-EXAMINATION
9 BY MR. TRABULUS:
10 Q Good afternoon, Ms. Walton. My name is Norman
11 Trabulus. It's nice to speak to somebody who is in the
12 business of helping people.
13 Let me show you something, Defendant's Exhibit
14 Q. Did anybody from the government ev er show you this,
15 ma'am?
16 A No.
17 Q I'm just going to direct your attention to page
18 13-92, madam.
19 Is that a listing for you in this book? Can you
20 see it?
21 A (Perusing.) It's a listing but I don't know what New
22 York, New Jersey and Connecticut. I don't work in them
23 three states. I only work in New York and it's not a
24 tri-state program.
25 Q Were there any people who were in the senior center
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6961
Walton-cross/Trabulus

1 who might have been from another state?
2 A No. Only from my community.
3 Q Is your name spelled correctly?
4 A No.
5 Q It's spelled incorrectly?
6 A Yes.
7 Q There's an E left out of Madeline?
8 A Yes.
9 Q Did you, Ms. Walton, ask for another plaque when you
10 sent the other one back?
11 A Y es.
12 Q Did you ever get it?
13 A No.
14 Q Let me ask you, I take it that you received a
15 telephone call first and then asked for literature and
16 then got that back in the mail?
17 A Yes.
18 Q And then sent it?
19 A Yes.
20 Q You were asked some questions by Ms. Scott about
21 whether how you would react if your name came from a
22 mailing list.
23 A I don't deal with mailing lists.
24 Q Excuse me. I'm just trying to set up for a question
25 I was going to ask you.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6962
Walton-cross/Trabulus

1 Ms. Scott asked you how you would feel if your
2 name would have come from a mailing list.
3 A I wouldn't have responded.
4 Q Did Ms. Scott tell you that your name came from a
5 mailing list?
6 A No.
7 Q Did anybody indicate to you that the fact th at you
8 were telephoned first might indicate that your name didn't
9 come from a mailing list but somebody else might have
10 specifically suggested that you be a member?
11 A As I explained, I thought it came from my college. I
12 thought I was selected from my college.
13 Q And did anybody -- you met with Ms. Scott --
14 A Today is the first day I met with Ms. Scott.
15 Q Did you speak to anyone from the postal service?
16 A Yes, I am.
17 THE COURT: Wait a minute. You have to wait
18 until Mr. Trabulus finishes his question before you
19 answer.
20 THE WITNESS: Okay.
21 THE COURT: Let there be a little pause.
22 THE WITNESS: Yes, Your Honor.
23 THE COURT: That means that both of you will not
24 talk at the same time.
25 Okay?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6963
Walton-cross/Trabulus

1 TH E WITNESS: Yes, sir.
2 BY MR. TRABULUS:
3 Q Did any of them explain to you or tell you that the
4 fact that you were telephoned first might indicate that in
5 fact another person, whether at your college or elsewhere,
6 had given your name to Who's Who Registry Worldwide to
7 contact?
8 A No.
9 Q Do you remember the name of the salesperson that you
10 spoke to, the salesman?
11 A I thought it was Keith, but I heard it was something
12 else.
13 Q Ms. Walton, I'm sure you haven't seen this before,
14 but I'm just showing it to you.
15 Do you see your name on it and in this case your
16 first name spelled correctly?
17 A Yes.
18 Q And this is an order form, it says Who's Who
19 Worldwide Registry?
20 A Because I spelled my name over the phone.
21 Q Because the mistake was somebody else's, I'm sure.
22 It is Who's Who Registry Inc., right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q Next to the word it says "account executive," there
25 is a number one and there is somebody's handwriting there?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6964
Walton-cross/Trabulus

1 A Yes.
2 Q And it says Mike Powers?
3 A Yes.
4 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, this is 5-C, if I may,
5 and may I publish it to the jury?
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 BY MR. TRABULUS:
8 Q Now, Ms. Walton, I just want to see if I got it
9 right. You thought that this was affiliated with the
10 Who's Who --
11 A I thought it was a spin-off from the Who's Who for
12 undergraduates.
13 Q And they didn't tell you that on the phone, did they,
14 when you spoke to them? They didn't say it was a spin-off
15 of the one that you were in when you graduated?
16 A No, they said nominated. I thought it was a

17 spin-off.
18 Q And if it was a spin-off of that Who's Who, would you
19 have been happy to be a member of it even today?
20 A I wouldn't have paid money because you don't have to
21 pay money to be in Who's Who.
22 Q In that one.
23 If in fact it was a spin-off -- well, thinking it
24 was a spin-off, you did pay money; is that fair to say?
25 A Because I thought I was getting the plaque, the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6965
Walton-cross/Trabulus

1 Registry and the credit card. That's what I paid the
2 money for.
3 Q And in terms of that Who's Who, let's say you were a
4 member of that Who's Who, would you be happy to be a
5 member of that even if it turned out that they had
6 obtained your name from a mailing list?
7 A No.
8 MR. TRABULUS: I have no further questions.
9 THE COURT: Anything else?

10 MR. DUNN: No questions, Your Honor.
11 MR. NELSON: No questions.
12 MR. LEE: No, sir.
13 MR. JENKS: No questions.
14 THE COURT: Anything further?
15 MS. SCOTT: Yes, Your Honor. Briefly I do have
16 something.
17 Your Honor, I would just ask for the card back,
18 that would be 5-D, just for a minute, from the jury.
19 THE COURT: Very well. There's the card.
20 (Continued.)
21
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6966
Walton-redirect/Scott

1 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
2 BY MS. SCOTT:
3 Q Ms. Walton, I want to ask you to take another look at
4 Government's Exhibit 5-D, the lead card that you filled
5 out. And once again, read off that little code you see in
6 the lower right-hand corner.
7 A GA Group L.
8 Q That's L as in Leon; is that correct?

9 A Yes.
10 Q I will show you Government's Exhibit 165 which is a
11 solicitation letter from Who's Who Worldwide dated
12 November 18, 1992.
13 MR. NELSON: Objection.
14 THE COURT: What ground?
15 MR. NELSON: This is beyond the scope of what the
16 direct examination was.
17 THE COURT: Why is this gone into?
18 MS. SCOTT: Mr. Trabulus asked Ms. Walton whether
19 she knows her name was taken from a mailing list and this
20 is related to that.
21 THE COURT: Overruled.
22 BY MS. SCOTT:
23 Q Now, Ms. Walton, if you take a look at the top of
24 that solicitation letter, do you see some handwriting
25 there?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6967
Walton-redirect/Scott

1 A Yes.
2 Q At bottom of the handwriting on the left-hand side,
3 do you see the same code that appeared on your lead card

4 on 5-D?
5 I'll point you to the left-hand side of that.
6 A No, that's not the same as this.
7 Q If you read that lettering that appears right
8 underneath the Who's Who letterhead, what does that say?
9 A BRCGA. I'm sorry. BRCGA Group L.
10 Q -- GA Group L is the same code that appears at the
11 bottom left-hand corner of the lead card as well?
12 A Yes.
13 MS. SCOTT: May I publish 165 and 5-D, Your
14 Honor?
15 THE COURT: Yes.
16 MS. SCOTT: All right. I have no further
17 questions.
18 THE COURT: Thank you.
19 MR. TRABULUS: I do very briefly but I need the
20 exhibits. I'll give them back.
21 (Continued.)
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6968
Walton-recross/Trabulus

1 RECROSS-EXAMINATION
2 BY MR. TRABULUS:
3 Q Ms. Walton, I jus t want to show you this letter that
4 has this code on the top that you were asked about.
5 This letter isn't addressed to you, is it?
6 A No.
7 Q You never saw this letter before?
8 A No.
9 Q So this is a letter that went to somebody else or is
10 addressed to somebody else that has something on it that
11 is also on this card, right?
12 A Yes.
13 Q And you don't know, as we don't know as we're here,
14 whether there's any relationship between this card and
15 this letter?
16 A I don't know. Maybe that's the symbol for my number
17 and they gave the man the same thing.
18 Q Do you know whether this letter that you got is
19 worded exactly the same -- excuse me.
20 Do you know whether this letter here, and you can
21 look at it, can you tell whether it was worded exactly the
22 same as the letter that came to you in the mail?
23 Let me ask you before that. Do you still have
24 the letter that was sent to you?
25 A No.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6969
Walton-recross/Trabulus

1 Q And it's years ago; am I right?
2 A Eight years ago.
3 Q So you wouldn't be able to tell whether it was the
4 same text or not, maybe similar?
5 A Basically.
6 Q Could be a different variation?
7 A This part nominated for possible inclusion.
8 Q Okay.
9 You don't know whether this card that you've got
10 was mailed to you from Who's Who Worldwide from their
11 offices or from some outside place that mailed it for
12 them. You would have no way of knowing that?
13 A Yes, because it had another part attached to the top
14 and you would have to separate it.
15 Q In terms of it was actually sent from Who's Who
16 Worldwide or an outside place that had ma iled things for
17 Who's Who Worldwide, you would have no way of knowing
18 that?
19 A Yes, because I told the guy to send me the
20 information.
21 Q So you think it came from Who's Who Worldwide itself?
22 A Yes.
23 MR. TRABULUS: I have no objection.
24 MS. SCOTT: I would ask that Mr. Trabulus just
25 return the exhibit to the jury.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6970
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 THE COURT: Anything else?
2 MS. SCOTT: Nothing further.
3 THE COURT: You may step down.
4 (Mr. Zerring returns to the stand.)
5 THE COURT: You are still under oath.
6 E L L I O T Z E R R I N G , having been previously sworn
7 by the Clerk of the Court, was examined and testified as
8 follows:
9 CROSS-EXAMINATION
10 BY MR. NELSON:
11 Q Mr. Zerring, from 1978 to 1992, how much would you

12 estimate in cash you received as a result of your
13 participation in the pool?
14 A I couldn't guess. I really couldn't guess.
15 Q Was it more than $300,000?
16 A I really couldn't guess.
17 Q How much money did you receive per year from the
18 pool?
19 A The last five or six years, it was an average of
20 about 35 to 40,000, except for that one year where we had
21 that extremely large case, the Rafella case.
22 Q So you would say 30 times 5, that's $150,000, right?
23 A Approximately.
24 Q And you received about $90,000 from Rafella; is that
25 right?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6971
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Approximately.
2 Q So that's about $250,000.
3 And the scam went back to 1978; is that right?
4 A Well, that's 1978 is when I started the business.
5 Q Right.
6 So from '78 u p until, let's say, 1986 how much
7 did you get between '78 and '86?
8 A I couldn't give you a guess.
9 Q More than 100,000?
10 A I couldn't answer that yes or no.
11 Q Let me ask you, in 1992, where were you living?
12 A I was living in Lawrence, New York.
13 Q And did you own a house then?
14 A Yes.
15 Q How much did you pay for that house?
16 A Approximately 200 some-odd thousand dollars.
17 Q Did you pay for that house in cash?
18 A No.
19 Q Did you do some improvements on the house?
20 A Yes.
21 Q How long did you own the house for?
22 A I owned that house roughly from -- I don't recall the
23 year I purchased it. It was some time ago.
24 Q How much money in improvements do you think that you
25 put in the house from '78 to '92?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6972
Zerring-cross/Nelson


1 A If I had to take an educated guess, I would say a
2 couple hundred thousand.
3 Q How much of that couple hundred thousand was in
4 green?
5 A If I had to guess, I would say maybe 20, 30 percent,
6 tops.
7 Q Am I correct that in about 1990, 1991, you bought a
8 boat for $140,000 in cash?
9 A Those figures are not correct.
10 Q Did you remember -- did you pay for the boat in cash?
11 A Partially.
12 Q How much cash did you pay for the boat?
13 A $140,000.
14 Q How much did the boat cost?
15 A $350,000 roughly.
16 Q It was a big boat, wasn't it?
17 A It was kind of big.
18 Q How many feet was it?
19 A 58 foot.
20 Q Bigger than this courtroom, wasn't it?
21 A I really don't know.
22 Q In 1990, what kind of car were you driving?
23 A I think I believe either a Mercedes or a Rolls Royce.
24 Q Either a Mercedes or a Rolls Royce.
25 Did you own both, a Mercedes and a Rolls Royce?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6973
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A At the time we had two cars, yes.
2 Q One was a Rolls Royce and the other was a Mercedes;
3 is that right?
4 A Yes.
5 Q And did you have any other cars besides the Mercedes
6 and the Rolls Royce?
7 A At the time I believe we had one other car.
8 Q What kind of car was that?
9 A BMW.
10 Q Was that the 740 BMW, the top of the line car?
11 A No.
12 Q The 318, the little one?
13 A The small one, yes.
14 Q Was that the one that you gave to your daughter to go
15 to NYU?
16 A That's the one that I gave to my daughter, not to go
17 to NYU.
18 Q Your daughter was going to NYU?
19 A I think she started NYU later on.
20 Q In 1993, 1994?

21 A Somewhere around there.
22 Q You were paying the tuition to NYU in cash?
23 A No.
24 Q Am I correct that with respect to the cash that you
25 received from '78 to '92, you weren't reporting that cash
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6974
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 on your income tax returns; is that right?
2 A That's correct.
3 Q But when you pled guilty you only pled guilty to one
4 year's income tax evasion for 1990; is that correct?
5 A No, that's not correct. I don't believe it's
6 correct.
7 Q Did you agree to pay back the Internal Revenue
8 Service the taxes that were due and owing for the cash
9 that you never reported?
10 A Yes, I did do that.
11 Q And did you negotiate with the Internal Revenue
12 Service what the total amount of cash, interest and
13 penalties was going to be?
14 A We ag reed to pay back the amount of monies based on I
15 think 1987 to 1992.
16 Q What about '78 to '87? Did you pay back that money?
17 A No.
18 Q And you didn't pay any of the interest or penalty
19 from '87 -- excuse me, from '78 to '86; is that correct?
20 A I don't believe so.
21 Q I believe you indicated just a few moments ago that
22 when you pled guilty to the tax charge, that related to
23 your tax charges going back to 1986; is that correct?
24 A '86 or'87.
25 Q I would like to show you at this time the information
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6975
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 that you pled guilty to which is 3500-23-A, and I would
2 like to direct your attention to Count 3 of that
3 information.
4 If you would look at it and read it to yourself
5 and see if that refreshes your recollection that you only
6 pled guilty to income tax evasion for one year?
7 A (Perusing.) Well, they state here calendar year 1990,
8 but I believe, to the best of my recollection, that the
9 taxes were paid back for '87 to '92.
10 Q But you only pled guilty to income tax evasion for
11 1990; is that correct?
12 Is that correct? That's what the information
13 provides.
14 A Say that again?
15 Q Count 3 of the information concerns your failure to
16 file a proper tax return and the filing of a fraudulent
17 tax return on April 15, 1991 for the 1990 tax year; is
18 that correct?
19 A Right.
20 Q Doesn't deal with 1989, does it?
21 A Doesn't say that specifically here, but to the best
22 of my knowledge, it was paid for.
23 Q Does it say here in the information?
24 A In the information, I don't see it.
25 Q So you didn't plead guilty to the crime of income tax

OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6976
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 evasion for 1989, 1988, 1987 and 1986, all years for which
2 you've admitted here that you in fact defrauded the
3 Internal Revenue Service, right?
4 A I really can't answer that yes or no.
5 Q Well, you've agreed to pay them back but you didn't
6 plead guilty to it; is that right?
7 A My understanding was I would pay the taxes back from
8 the years '87 to '92.
9 Q You entered into a formal written plea agreement and
10 you pled guilty to a formal plea agreement?
11 A Yes.
12 Q And before you entered into that plea agreement you
13 met with agents of the government, your attorney and
14 yourself, right?
15 A Yes.
16 Q A number of meetings.
17 Those meetings started on December 29, 1992; is
18 that right?
19 A Yes.
20 Q Your attorney was Dominick Amorosa?
21 A Yes.
22 Q He was a private attorney you had?
23 A Yes.
24 Q And you met with Mr. Amorosa after a search warrant
25 was executed on one of the offices that you participated
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6977
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 with the people from the pool from?
2 A Say that again?
3 Q You hadn't been arrested when you first spoke with
4 the government?
5 A No.
6 Q But you knew that the government had already targeted
7 the operation that you had been a participant in; is that
8 right?
9 A Can you be more specific on that question, please?
10 Q Well, a search warrant was executed upon a certain
11 premises?
12 A Yes.
13 Q What was that premises?
14 A 935 Northern Boulevard, Great Neck.
15 Q What was located there?
16 A My office.
17 Q Since you were a 50 percent partner in that business
18 you knew that you were a target of a federal
19 investigation?
20 A I can only assume so, yes.
21 Q And you hired Mr. Amorosa to be your attorney; is
22 that right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q At a later point in time following discussions with
25 Mr. Amorosa, you went to the U.S. Attorney's Office with
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6978
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 him and you met with a number of Assistant United States
2 Attorneys along with your attorney; isn't that right?
3 A Yes, sir.
4 Q And present during the course of that meeting at the
5 U.S. Attorney's Office was Postal Inspector Martin
6 Biegelman; is that correct?
7 A I believe that is correct.
8 Q He was there from the very first day you walked into
9 the United States Attorney's Office on December 29, 1992?
10 A I'm pretty sure that's the case.
11 Q From 1992 up to the time you actually entered your
12 guilty plea in August of 1993, did you continue to meet
13 with Mr. Biegelman and other representatives of the United
14 States Government to discuss the investigation that you
15 had been a participant in?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And during that same period of time, did you discuss
18 with your attorney negotiating a plea bargain on your
19 behalf?
20 A I'm not sure if I understand that last question.
21 Q During the period of time from your first visit to
22 the United States Attorney's Office to the date you
23 actually entered your guilty plea in 1993, did you have
24 discussions with your attorney about plea negotiations,
25 what you might plead guilty to?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6979
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A It might have come up in discussion, but he was
2 representing and he was my criminal attorney and took care
3 of that.
4 Q Based on your discussions with your attorney, did you
5 eventually enter into a cooperation agreement with the
6 government?
7 A Yes.
8 Q I would like to show you the cooperation agreement
9 which is Government's Exhibit 3500-23-B.
10 Do you recognize that document, sir?
11 A Yes.
12 Q And I would like to turn to the last page which would
13 be page 7.
14 Am I correct that the agreement is signed by you,
15 your attorney and an Assistant United States Attorney?
16 A Yes.
17 Q And this is the agreement you eventually enteFF0000; is
18 that correct?
19 A Yes.
20 Q Before you entered into that plea agreement, did you
21 review the agreement with your attorney?
22 Before you signed the agreement, did yo u review
23 it?
24 A Yes.
25 Q And you read through it to find out what it was you
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6980
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 were agreeing to; is that right?
2 A More or less.
3 Q When you spoke with Mr. Amorosa, did he advise you
4 that you faced a maximum sentence of 15 years
5 incarceration, five years for each of the offenses that
6 you were pleading guilty to, that could potentially be
7 consecutive; is that right?
8 A I believe that is correct.
9 Q And during the course of those discussions, did he
10 tell you that the government wouldn't prosecute you for
11 income tax evasion for the years going back before 1990?
12 A I don't remember that conversation at all.
13 Q Did you ever have any discussions with him about the
14 possibilities that you could be prosecuted for income tax

15 evasion going back as far as 1978?
16 A I don't recall at all ever having that conversation.
17 Q Did you have discussions with Mr. Amorosa about there
18 being something called federal sentencing guidelines?
19 A To some degree.
20 Q And did Mr. Amorosa explain to you that when you are
21 sentenced, separate and apart from the 15 year maximum you
22 might potentially face, the federal sentencing guidelines
23 would be used by Judge Wexler, the Judge who is eventually
24 going to sentence you, in order to impose sentence. Did
25 he explain that to you?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6981
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Did he explain what?
2 Q The federal sentencing guidelines.
3 A We talked about it, I believe.
4 Q Okay.
5 Did Mr. Amorosa tell you that under the federal
6 sentencing guidelines, it was mandatory that the Judge
7 would have to sentence you to a period of incarceration
8 based upon the amount of the fraud that you had
9 perpetrated?
10 A Well, that's the way the guidelines are set up.
11 Q And did he explain to you that you had to go to
12 jail? That if you plead guilty you had to go to jail
13 under the guidelines? Did he tell you that?
14 A I guess basically he must have.
15 Q And, well, you agreed to enter what is called a
16 cooperation agreement?
17 A Yes.
18 Q Are you telling me Mr. Amorosa, an attorney who you
19 paid money to represent you, didn't explain to you before
20 you entered the agreement that you had to go to jail under
21 these sentencing guidelines if you plead guilty?
22 A I guess he in some way tried to explain that to me.
23 Q Did you understand it?
24 A I guess at the time I did, yeah.
25 Q Well, did you understand that he explained to you
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6982
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 that there was only one way out of possibly going to jail,
2 of having to go to jail? Did he tell you that?
3 A I don't recall specifically him saying that.
4 Q As you sit here today, would you expect that Judge
5 Wexler will send you to prison?
6 A Do I expect him?
7 Q Yes.
8 A Well, I have a cooperation agreement which allows him
9 to depart downward from those guidelines.
10 Q And you are hoping that by cooperating you'll not go
11 to jail; is that right?
12 A Absolutely.
13 Q That's why you are sitting here today testifying,
14 isn't that right? You are hoping not to go to jail,
15 right?
16 A I'm hoping not to go to jail, right.
17 Q Now, when you sat down with Inspector Biegelman for
18 the first time on Decemb er 29, 1992, at that time you also
19 were hoping not to go to jail; isn't that right?
20 A Yes.
21 Q And you were hoping by going in to cooperate with the
22 government in their investigation of the fraud you had
23 participated in you would potentially avoid going to jail;
24 is that right?
25 A Could you repeat that, please?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6983
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 MR. NELSON: I'll withdraw the question and
2 rephrase it.
3 BY MR. NELSON:
4 Q When you went to see Inspector Biegelman for the
5 first time on December 29, 1992, that was with the hope
6 that you wouldn't have to go to jail, right?
7 A Well, I didn't know at that point what my situation
8 would be. If you could ask maybe a little more specific
9 question, I don't know where you're going.
10 Q Let's start with the first time y ou decided to go to
11 the United States Attorney's Office. Did you go there
12 with the hope of avoiding going to jail?
13 Yes or no?
14 A I was going there knowing that I was going to enter
15 into a cooperation agreement and that the cooperation
16 agreement, if I give full and substantial information,
17 that -- and this would allow the Honorable Wexler to
18 depart from the guidelines.
19 Q And that meant that you were hoping that you wouldn't
20 have to go to jail by cooperating; is that correct?
21 A Correct.
22 Q Now, the initial part of your cooperation involved
23 cooperating with Mr. Biegelman against the people who you
24 had participated in this fraud with; is that right?
25 A In which fraud?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6984
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q Well, that's a good question actually.
2 Th e conspiracy to engage in mail fraud involving,
3 let's start with AIG Insurance and Rafella Sportswear.
4 A Yes.
5 Q And you agreed to participate and advise Inspector
6 Biegelman and the government about the different people
7 who you were partners with in that fraud?
8 A Yes.
9 Q And you agreed in telling him about the different
10 insurance people who you agreed to pay off; is that
11 correct?
12 A Yes.
13 Q And you did the same with respect to all the other
14 participants in the pool; is that right?
15 A Yes.
16 Q Now, from 1992 to November 1994, when you eventually
17 went to go work at Who's Who Worldwide, did you
18 participate in any other investigations at the request of
19 Inspector Biegelman?
20 A Can you be more specific?
21 Q Did you wear a wire in any other investigations that
22 Inspector Biegelman asked you to part icipate in?
23 A Yes.
24 Q And what were those?
25 A I believe there was one other.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6985
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q What was that?
2 A Can you --
3 Q What was the other investigation that you wore a wire
4 for?
5 A It pertained to the insurance industry.
6 Q So it was a different fraudulent scheme involving the
7 insurance company, the insurance industry between '92 and
8 '94; is that right?
9 A It happened to be part of the Rafella case.
10 Q So it was still part of the same investigation; is
11 that right?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Other than the insurance fraud that you participated
14 in, did you engage in any other cooperation with Inspector
15 Biegelman between '92 and '94?
16 A Can you rephrase that question? Specifically I'm not
17 sure what you're saying.
18 Q Did you go undercover in any other investigations?
19 A No.
20 Q Did you make telephone calls at the request of the
21 government in any other investigations?
22 A No.
23 Q Did you go to work for any other companies at the
24 request of Inspector Biegelman during '92 to '94?
25 A No.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6986
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q But between '92 and '94, you weren't in jail; is that
2 right?
3 A That's correct.
4 Q And you were out during that period of time; is that
5 correct?
6 A Yes.
7 Q And during that entire period of time, the
8 investigation into the various different people who you
9 had participated in the fraud with was ongoing; is that
10 right?
11 A Yes.
12 Q Now, there came a point in time in 1994 where
13 Inspector Biegelman came to you an d asked you to go work
14 at Who's Who Worldwide, is that correct?
15 A Yes.
16 Q And did he call you in order to do that? Did he
17 bring you to his office in order to do that? I mean, how
18 did this come about initially?
19 A I believe I happened to be in his office in another
20 insurance matter or something.
21 Q At that time he asked you to participate in his
22 investigation involving a completely unrelated entity; is
23 that right?
24 A Yes.
25 Q And that would have been whether when, in October or
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6987
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 November of 1994, as best you can recall?
2 A I believe it was in November.
3 Q Now, you went to work there at end of November of
4 1994; is that right?
5 A Correct.
6 Q Before --
7 A I started actually, as I said earlier, I start ed work
8 December 6th, but I actually was interviewed November
9 28th, I believe.
10 Q Now, at the time that you spoke to Inspector
11 Biegelman in his office, you hadn't been sentenced yet,
12 right?
13 A Hadn't been sentenced.
14 Q At the time you spoke with Inspector Biegelman in
15 November of 1994 at his office, you hadn't been sentenced
16 yet?
17 A I hadn't been sentenced yet.
18 Q And you knew at that time, am I correct, that
19 Inspector Biegelman was one of the people who would give
20 input to the Assistant United States Attorney who would be
21 writing a letter on your behalf to Judge Wexler in order
22 to permit Judge Wexler to depart below the mandatory
23 federal sentencing guidelines that you faced; isn't that
24 right?
25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6988
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q And you knew that Inspector Biegelman was a person
2 who would give a tremendous amount of insight into what
3 would be included in the letter that would be given to
4 Judge Wexler in determining your sentence?
5 A I believe he was one of many, many people.
6 Q But he was the person who you first started
7 cooperating with, right? He was there the very first day,
8 December 29, 1992?
9 A Yes.
10 Q And he was the person who was present during many,
11 many, many of your meetings from 1992 to 1994, correct?
12 A As I said before, that is correct, but there were
13 also many, many, many other law enforcement people
14 involved in this case that I worked with.
15 Q Now, am I correct that Inspector Biegelman was also
16 the individual who was -- who would sign the affidavit in
17 support of the search warrant that lead to the raid on
18 your place of business?
19 A I believe that is correct.
20 Q So you knew he was the lead agent on your case; is
21 that right?
22 A I believe that he was, yeah. He probably was. I
23 mean, I'm not in that end of the business, the law
24 enforcement business.
25 Q You were shown the affidavit in support of the search
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6989
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 warrant by your attorney, Mr. Amorosa?
2 A Yes, some time ago.
3 Q And he showed you Inspector Biegelman had signed it,
4 didn't he?
5 A To the best of my recollection, that is probably
6 correct.
7 Q You knew when you met with Mr. Biegelman for the very
8 first time on December 29, 1992, that he was the person
9 who was the lead investigator in the investigation of you;
10 is that correct?
11 A You are using the word "lead." I can't be su re. I'm
12 not going to guess that he was the lead, I don't know.
13 There were other agents there, FBI agents there.
14 Q How many other agents were present at the course of
15 that first meeting you had at the U.S. Attorney's Office?
16 A FBI agents, couple U.S. Attorneys and I'm not sure if
17 there was another person there.
18 Q When you were in Inspector Biegelman's office in
19 1994, am I correct that he instructed you to go in and
20 pose as an employee of Who's Who Worldwide?
21 A Yes.
22 Q And the Inspector told you that he believed that
23 Who's Who Worldwide was committing some form of mail
24 fraud; is that right?
25 A Some type of a fraud. I don't know specifically.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6990
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q And you agreed to do what Inspector Biegelman asked
2 of you because you believ ed by cooperating with him it
3 would help you in receiving a more favorable sentence
4 before Judge Wexler; is that right?
5 A It was part of my agreement to cooperate fully,
6 substantially, accurately and truthfully.
7 Q And he recruited you literally two years after you
8 decided to cooperate and a year after you pled guilty in
9 order to go work for Who's Who Worldwide; is that right?
10 A That was November 20, 1994.
11 Q And when he asked you to go do it, you agreed to meet
12 him; is that correct?
13 A That's correct.
14 Q And the insurance fraud that you perpetrated
15 certainly had absolutely nothing to do with Who's Who
16 Worldwide?
17 A I believe so. That's correct.
18 Q It had nothing to do with Bruce Gordon or any of the
19 people who were sitting here on trial right now; is that
20 correct?
21 A To the best of my knowledge.

22 Q I represent Frank Osman, Frank Martin, who is seated
23 here at the far side. He had nothing to do with the
24 insurance fraud; is that right?
25 A I don't believe so.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6991
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q Now, it just so happens, though, that the agent who
2 was investigating your crimes was Inspector Biegelman;
3 isn't that right?
4 A He was one of many, I guess.
5 Q And it was Inspector Biegelman who told you that the
6 way for you to work off any possible jail sentence was to
7 help him in this investigation he was now doing; isn't
8 that right?
9 A I don't believe that's what he told me on the day
10 that he was engaged in that particular investigation, you
11 know. At that point I had been working with Inspector
12 Biegelman and many other investigative people with the
13 gove rnment at that point in time.
14 Q And he pulled you off of that investigation and put
15 you into this one?
16 A Not really. I worked days and nights. I was still
17 involved, you know, full-time.
18 Q So you were working as a full-time informant during
19 that period of time?
20 A Sure.
21 Q So let me understand. You worked at Who's Who
22 Worldwide from the beginning of December 1994 until
23 mid-February 1995, correct?
24 A February 15, 1995, I believe.
25 Q And you were working five days a week there?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6992
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Right.
2 Q So during that period of time you were also working
3 with Inspector Biegelman in the insurance fraud
4 investigation, correct?
5 A To some degree, that's what I'm saying.
6 Q So you were working sort of every day and night wi th
7 Inspector Biegelman?
8 A And weekends.
9 Q So you were working seven days a week with Inspector
10 Biegelman?
11 A Pretty much so.
12 Q You were literally in contact with this man almost
13 nonstop during this period of time?
14 A For the most part, that is correct.
15 Q And you were keeping him up-to-date day-to-day on
16 what was happening at Who's Who Worldwide?
17 A When he would call up I would give him the
18 information.
19 Q Immediately?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Because you would do whatever it was that he would
22 ask you to do?
23 A Absolutely. It was part of my agreement.
24 Q And whatever it is that he would ask you to do, you
25 would do, right?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6993
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Yes.
2 Q And it's he who told you to apply for a job at Who' s
3 Who Worldwide, right?
4 A Yes.
5 Q And it's he who asked you to wear a body wire at
6 Who's Who Worldwide; is that right?
7 A Yes, a concealed tape-recorder.
8 Q A little Nagra tape-recorder?
9 A A little square type box.
10 Q It's he who advised you, it was he who thought there
11 was criminal conduct going on in Who's Who Worldwide;
12 isn't that right?
13 A Could you repeat that once more?
14 Q Inspector Biegelman told you to carry that little
15 tape-recorder into Who's Who Worldwide and to apply for a
16 job in Who's Who Worldwide because he thought they were
17 doing something wrong, right?
18 MR. WHITE: Objection.
19 THE COURT: Let me hear it again.
20 (Record read.)
21 THE COURT: Overruled.
22 THE WITNESS: Answer the question?
23 THE COURT: Yes.
24 THE WITNESS: Could you read it one more time,
25 please?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6994
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 (Record read.)
2 THE COURT: See, it's something wrong, right?
3 That's bad.
4 THE WITNESS: Right.
5 THE COURT: What did Inspector Biegelman tell you
6 when he told you to go in there?
7 THE WITNESS: To wear the concealed tape-recorder
8 and tape a complete full day of work there whatever the
9 full day entailed and he told me to follow the
10 instructions of the company, whatever the normal
11 instructions for the company was. That's what he told me.
12 MR. NELSON: Thank you.
13 Q When you first went for the job interview there, that
14 was in November of 1994, correct?
15 A November 28th, I think.
16 Q Yes.
17 A Yes.
18 Q And you then started working there the first week in
19 December of 1994, right?
20 A I bel ieve that was the 6th of December, yes.
21 Q And shortly after you first started working there,
22 you started bringing in this tape-recorder to record
23 conversations; is that right?
24 A Yes.
25 Q Now, did you wear the tape-recorder and record all of
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6995
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 the discussions and conversations that were taking place
2 every day?
3 A I would say just about.
4 Q So you would arrive at work at about 9 o'clock in the
5 morning; is that right?
6 A Sometimes 8:30, sometimes 9.
7 Q Leave there around 4:30, 5 o'clock?
8 A Yes, sometimes there was a meeting after hours.
9 Q And you recorded the events that took place from the
10 time you arrived until the time you left?
11 A All the events.
12 Q And that was five days a week?
13 A Yes, sir.
14 Q An d that was from the period of time from December,
15 approximately December 6th to February 15th; is that
16 correct?
17 A That's correct.
18 Q And would I be correct in stating that you made
19 literally hundreds of tape records, hundreds of tapes
20 during that period of time you were working there?
21 A Hundreds of tapes? I don't believe there were that
22 many. There were many, but I don't believe that there
23 were that many. I don't believe that is accurate.
24 Q Would I be correct that each day you worked there you
25 would call that -- a particular day's tape, you would
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6996
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 break down all of the recordings from that one day and say
2 this is Elliot Zerring's tape number one for that day?
3 A To some degree.
4 Q And would I be correct in stating that the tape

5 didn't run for seven hours so you had to insert different
6 tapes?
7 A Oh, yes.
8 Q So each day you would have two or three or four
9 tapes; is that right?
10 A I think the maximum is maybe two, sometimes less than
11 two, you know.
12 Q Did you turn off the tape at different times during
13 the course of the day?
14 A For the most part, as I said, I left it running all
15 of the time except for the fact that when it ran out, one
16 side, I had to turn it over to the other side.
17 Q So you didn't record everything that was taking place
18 all day, every day?
19 A Most of everything.
20 Q All the recordings you eventually made you did turn
21 over eventually to the government; is that right?
22 A Yes.
23 Q Were you given any specific instructions about who to
24 report?
25 A No.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6997
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q Were you given any specific instructions about what
2 to record?
3 A No.
4 Q Now, are you aware, sir -- withdrawn.
5 A Excuse me.
6 Q The government has shown you a series of transcripts
7 that are included in a log which I believe they numbered
8 13-89 to 14-03 that was shown to you earlier today; is
9 that correct?
10 A I don't have that in front of me, so I don't want to
11 guess.
12 Q But they showed that to you; is that right?
13 A They showed me some transcripts, yes.
14 MR. NELSON: May I see the government book of
15 transcripts?
16 BY MR. NELSON:
17 Q I would like you to look in the book from 13-87 to
18 the end which is 14-03.
19 Those are the recordings that the government has
20 shown you at this time; is that right?
21 A 13-87 is correct.
22 13-88-A is correct, I've seen that.
23 13-89-A.
24 13-90-A is included here. And I believe 13-90-B
25 looks correct. 13-90-C is correct. 13-90-D.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6998
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 13-91-A would be part of it.
2 13-92-A is part of it.
3 13-93-A is certainly part of it.
4 13-94-A is part of it.
5 13-95-A is part of it.
6 13-96-A is part of it.
7 13-97-A looks like it's part of it.
8 13-98-A looks like part of it.
9 13-99-A, I don't believe I've seen this before.
10 I don't believe I've seen 13-99-A.
11 Q Okay.
12 A I don't believe I've seen that.
13 Q 13-99-A was not a transcript of something you
14 recorded; is that correct?
15 A That's correct.
16 Q Now, from 14-00 to 14-03.
17 A Yes, 14-00-A is something that I've seen in the
18 transcript.

19 14-01-A, yes.
20 14-02-A I've seen.
21 And 14-03-A is included in that.
22 Q Thank you, Mr. Zerring.
23 A You're welcome.
24 Q Mr. Zerring, have you reviewed all of those
25 transcripts prior to your testimony here?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
6999
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Yes, I have.
2 Q And would I be correct in stating -- withdrawn.
3 Did you also review after you recorded them, the
4 vast majority of the tapes you made from the time that you
5 first started working at Who's Who until the time you were
6 terminated?
7 A Okay. Can I ask you to just be a little more
8 specific again?
9 Q Sure.
10 After you would record a tape, would you listen
11 to the tape again?
12 A After I recorded it immediately?
13 Q Yes.
14 A No, I didn't listen to it right after, no.

15 Q Between the time you were terminated in 1994 and you
16 were appearing here in court to testify, have you listened
17 through those recordings?
18 A Uhm, yeah, I've listened to the tapes. I can't
19 really say if I listened to all of them.
20 Q But you've listened to a lot of them; is that
21 correct?
22 A Yeah, yeah. Yes.
23 Q Would I be correct in stating that the transcripts
24 that are before you right here are portions of different
25 recordings that you made on different days while you were
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7000
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 working at Who's Who Worldwide?
2 A I would say that is true.
3 Q And they certainly would reflect far less than the
4 total amount of recordings that you made while you were
5 working at Who's Who Worldwide; is that correct?
6 A Yes.
7 Q And those rec ordings reflect portions of recordings
8 that the government has sought to introduce in evidence as
9 part of this trial; is that correct?
10 A Well, I can't tell you how they were thinking. I can
11 only tell you what I reviewed.
12 Q What you see here; is that right?
13 A Yes.
14 Q And it's those particular transcripts of portions of
15 recordings; is that correct?
16 A Yes.
17 Q If we took all the recordings that you made and made
18 transcripts out of them, would it be fair for me to state
19 that we would probably fill up about a wall of this
20 courtroom with the transcripts of all of the different
21 people who were speaking during the course of that seven
22 or eight week period of time?
23 A I don't think it would be that much.
24 Q It would be at least 10 volumes, wouldn't that be
25 correct?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7001
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Honestly, you are asking me to guess and I don't
2 believe that would be the case. It would be more.
3 Q It would be a lot more than that?
4 A You want me to say a lot more, I think so. I can't
5 say. Everything is relative. It would be more, yes,
6 yes. Absolutely more.
7 Q Did you review with the government those portions of
8 the transcripts that are in that book?
9 Did you sit down and go over them with an agent
10 or an investigator with the government?
11 A Yes.
12 Q And did you go over the recordings in order to select
13 those portions of the recordings?
14 A I didn't select them, no.
15 Q Somebody else selected them; is that right?
16 A I guess so, yes.
17 Q Now, I represent Frank Martin, as I told you before.
18 You met Frank Martin while you were working at Who's Who

19 Worldwide?
20 A Yes.
21 Q And he was one of the group leaders while you were
22 working there; is that correct?
23 A Yes.
24 Q You advised us that you made these various different
25 recordings on a day-to-day basis.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7002
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Did the postal agents, particularly Inspector
2 Biegelman, go over what you had recorded on a daily basis
3 with you while you were working at Who's Who?
4 A What I would record? No. As I said earlier, I
5 recorded the complete day and days that I was there and
6 not anything specific. Anything.
7 Q Did you sit down with the various different agents --
8 withdrawn.
9 Did you review in summary what had occurred on a
10 daily basis with the agents?
11 A I'm sorry?
12 Q On a daily basis, did you speak with Inspector
13 Biegelman?
14 A On a daily basis, yes. I made some notes basically
15 which is an overview of what happened in that 30 days
16 activity.
17 Q At any point in time, during the period you were
18 making these recordings, did Inspector Biegelman ever say
19 to you that it might be a good thing to attempt to close
20 down Who's Who Worldwide during the course of your
21 discussions with him?
22 A Never.
23 Q Did he ever tell you it might be a good idea to
24 notify the company that the inspectors felt they were
25 doing something improper?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7003
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A Did he ask me to tell them that?
2 Q No, did Inspector Biegelman ever say to you, you
3 know, it might be a good idea to go into Who's Who
4 Worldwide and say, you know, I think what you're saying in
5 the script do esn't seem right. Could you stop doing
6 that. Did he ever mention that to you during the course
7 of time?
8 A Not that I recall.
9 Q Did you ever say to Inspector Biegelman, you know,
10 Inspector, why don't you go in there and tell them, could
11 you change something they're saying there, we don't think
12 that is right. Did you ever tell that to him while you
13 were working there?
14 A No.
15 Q Did you ever ask him, gee, why don't you just ask him
16 to change what they are saying in the presentation if you
17 think it is not right?
18 A No.
19 Q And they never did that, to your knowledge, during
20 the period of time that you were working there, right?
21 A As I previously stated, the answer is no.
22 Q Now, I believe you testified that there came a point
23 in time where you were terminated from your employment; is
24 that right?

25 A Yes.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7004
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 Q And do you remember going to speak to Frank Martin
2 about that just before you left?
3 A Oh, yeah. It was Frank, I believe, that let me know
4 that I was being terminated.
5 Q And did Mr. Martin tell you that he had a friend in
6 another company and if you wanted to go work there he
7 might be able to help you work in another company?
8 A Yes, I believe he offered that to me.
9 Q Am I correct that Frank Martin wasn't very happy
10 about the fact that you had to be terminated, did he tell
11 you that?
12 A Probably did. It's been a while already, I don't
13 know exactly.
14 Q Am I correct that Mr. Martin was present during a
15 number of the different meetings while you were working at
16 Who's Who Worldwide?
17 A Yes.
18 Q Am I correct that Mr. Martin told you at a fair
19 number of times -- withdrawn.
20 Am I correct that at these meetings Mr. Martin
21 would provide to you are what you called when you wrote
22 notes to the agent, pep rallies?
23 A Could you just run that back to me again, please?
24 Q Did Mr. Martin basically provide at the sales
25 meetings pep rallies?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7005
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 A You are calling them "pep rallies" --
2 Q Did you use the word "pep rallies" in the notes you
3 prepared to the agents?
4 A I can't answer that honestly, yes or no.
5 Q Mr. Martin didn't write the scripts?
6 A I don't know.
7 Q He didn't write the objection sheets?
8 A No, I don't know.
9 Q He didn't own the company?
10 A To my knowledge, I don't believe so.
11 Q You became aware shortly a fter you went to work at
12 Who's Who Worldwide that Mr. Martin just returned to the
13 company a few weeks before you started after being away
14 for two or three years; isn't that right?
15 A I learned that he returned to the company after being
16 away, but I don't know the time-frame.
17 Q And you were aware that he was only recently back
18 with the company; is that right?
19 A Yeah.
20 Q Now, Mr. Martin's job when he spoke to you was to
21 motivate you; is that right?
22 A I guess that was the intention.
23 Q He did it by your sales lecture; is that right?
24 A Yes, sir.
25 Q And his function was to get the telemarketers,
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7006
Zerring-cross/Nelson

1 because you were a new telemarketer, to follow the
2 presentations that were being provided in order to make
3 sales; is tha t right?
4 A Yes.
5 Q And he was telling you how you were supposed to
6 follow the script; is that right?
7 A That was one of his jobs, yes, sir.
8 Q And he was also telling you how to follow the script
9 without sounding like you were reading from a script; is
10 that right?
11 A Reasonably correct.
12 Q Would it be fair to say during these various sales
13 meetings Mr. Martin stressed to you over and over again he
14 very much believed in the product that Who's Who Worldwide
15 was putting out there?
16 A He stressed it not only to me but he was talking to a
17 whole audience, more or less.
18 Q And he stressed that he believed in the product; is
19 that right?
20 A I believe that is true.
21 MR. NELSON: Thank you. I have no other
22 questions.
23 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
24 THE COURT: Anybody else?
25 MR. DUNN: N o questions, Your Honor.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7007
Zerring-cross/Neville

1 MR. TRABULUS: No questions, Your Honor.
2 MR. NEVILLE: I have a few, Your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Very well.
4 CROSS-EXAMINATION
5 BY MR. NEVILLE: .
6 Q Do you know somebody by the name of Sue Mantell?
7 A I met her at Who's Who.
8 Q Didn't she also live near you there in Lawrence or
9 somewhere?
10 A Yes, I believe she did.
11 Q She saw you driving your Rolls Royce?
12 A I have no idea.
13 Q What color is that Rolls Royce?
14 A White.
15 Q I have one more question.
16 Did you ever do any insurance claims on houses
17 that burned down in Mill Neck, New York, Feeks Lane?
18 A Not that I recall. I don't believe so.
19 Q How about where someone had their limousine broken
20 into and they inflated the clai m. Anything to do with
21 that ever?
22 A I can't recall that at all, sir.
23 MR. NEVILLE: I have no further questions.
24 THE COURT: Anything else?
25 Any redirect?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7008
Zerring-redirect/White

1 MR. WHITE: Yes, Your Honor.
2 Your Honor, may I ask that we take our break now
3 because I could use a few minutes to organize my
4 thoughts.
5 THE COURT: Very well. We'll take our recess.
6 Members of the jury, keep an open mind.
7 Please recess yourselves.
8 (Jury exits.)
9 (Recess taken.)
10 (Jury enters.)
11 THE COURT: Please be seated, members of the
12 jury.
13 You may proceed, Mr. White.
14 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
15 BY MR. WHITE:
16 Q Mr. Zerring, do any of your prior crimes change
17 anything that the defendants said on the tape you ma de?
18 MR. LEE: Objection.
19 THE COURT: Well, sustained as to form.
20 Q Did your prior crimes have any effect on the
21 tape-recordings that you made while you were at Who's Who
22 Worldwide?
23 MR. NELSON: Objection.
24 THE COURT: Overruled.
25 THE WITNESS: May I answer that?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7009
Zerring-redirect/White

1 THE COURT: Yes.
2 A No.
3 Q Did whether or not you paid your taxes have any
4 effect on whether you paid your taxes at Who's Who
5 Worldwide?
6 A No.
7 Q Whether or not you paid for your boat or Rolls Royce
8 effected what you made at Who's Who Worldwide?
9 A No.
10 Q Has anyone from the government told you who the other
11 witnesses in this case are?
12 A No.
13 Q Do you know who the other witnesses at this trial
14 are?

15 A Well, I sort of learned just by being in this witness
16 room here yesterday, I assumed that the person would have
17 to be there was a witness.
18 Q Aside from someone you saw in the witness room today
19 or yesterday, do you know who the witnesses are here?
20 A Absolutely not.
21 Q Do you know anything about the other evidence in this
22 case?
23 A No, I do not.
24 Q Aside from reviewing the tapes that you made and the
25 materials that you got when you were at Who's Who
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7010
Zerring-redirect/White

1 Worldwide, have you reviewed any of the other evidence in
2 this case?
3 A Can you repeat that again, Mr. White?
4 Q Aside from your own tapes and the other materials
5 that you got when you were at Who's Who Worldwide, have
6 you reviewed any other evidence?
7 A Oh, no. No, sir.
8 Q Now, Mr. Nelson asked you about the home that you
9 were living in in the early 1990s. Do you remember that?
10 A Yes, I do.
11 Q Do you still have that home?
12 A No, I do not.
13 Q What happened to it?
14 A The house was foreclosed.
15 Q Now, do you own a home now?
16 A No, I do not.
17 Q Where do you live?
18 A In Florida.
19 Q Do you rent it?
20 A Yes, I'm renting right now.
21 Q Do you still have your boat?
22 A No, I do not.
23 Q Do you still have your Rolls Royce?
24 A Absolutely not.
25 Q Do you still have your public adjuster's license?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7011
Zerring-redirect/White

1 A No, I do not, sir.
2 Q What happened to your public adjuster's license?
3 A You cannot -- I don't know if the proper term is it
4 has been revoked or never been -- I just don't have it
5 anymore. I didn't renew it. You can't practice having a
6 criminal record.
7 Q When is it that you did not renew it?
8 A I believe it was '92 or '93, I believe, to -- a best
9 guess recollection.
10 Q And did you say earlier today that you are now
11 unemployed?
12 A Yes, I am.
13 Q How long have you been unemployed for?
14 A Well, I've been unemployed, basically, for
15 approximately the last year.
16 Q And tell us how you've been supporting yourself?
17 A I've been supporting myself from the monies that I've
18 basically saved, you know, or that I have in a pension, an
19 IRA.
20 Q You mentioned on direct examination about testimony
21 you gave in connection with a lawsuit that insurance
22 companies had brought against Rafella Sportswear, right?
23 A Yes.
24 MR. NELSON: Objection.

25 THE COURT: On what ground?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7012
Zerring-redirect/White

1 MR. NELSON: I didn't ask him questions with
2 respect to a lawsuit involving Rafella Sportswear. It's
3 beyond the scope of redirect examination.
4 MR. JENKS: Just repeating it again.
5 THE COURT: On the representation that he did not
6 ask that by Mr. Nelson, that is correct.
7 MR. WHITE: I don't think that is correct, but
8 I'll move along.
9 BY MR. WHITE:
10 Q Mr. Nelson asked you while the time you were
11 cooperating if Inspector Biegelman ever said to you or
12 suggested to you that it would be a good idea for either
13 him or you to go to Who's Who Worldwide and tell them to
14 stop doing what they were doing. Do you remember that?
15 A Yes.
16 Q And in your case, did Inspector Biegelman or any law
17 enforceme nt agent ever stop by your adjusting firm just to
18 tell you to stop doing what you're doing before they
19 served it?
20 MR. SCHOER: Objection.
21 THE COURT: Sustained.
22 BY MR. WHITE:
23 Q Before they asked you to do the search warrant, did
24 any law enforcement tell you maybe you should stop doing
25 what you were doing?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7013
Zerring-redirect/White

1 MR. SCHOER: Objection.
2 THE COURT: Sustained.
3 Q Did you have any contacts with the law enforcement
4 agents before they asked you to --
5 MR. SCHOER: Objection.
6 THE COURT: Sustained. Desist.
7 BY MR. WHITE:
8 Q Mr. Zerring, if you could take a look at Government's
9 Exhibit 3500-23-B, for Boy.
10 Can you tell us what that is?
11 A That's my cooperation agreement.
12 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, I off er 3500-23-B.
13 THE COURT: Any objection?
14 MR. SCHOER: No objection.
15 MR. NELSON: No objection, Your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Government's 3500-23-B in evidence.
17 (Government's Exhibit 23-B received in evidence.)
18 BY MR. WHITE:
19 Q Now, Mr. Zerring, can you explain for us what your
20 understanding is of what could happen to you if you were
21 untruthful in your trial testimony here today?
22 MR. SCHOER: Objection.
23 THE COURT: Overruled.
24 A The government, based on my contractual agreement or
25 my cooperation agreement that I made, if I'm untruthful,
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7014
Zerring-redirect/White

1 they can discard this cooperation agreement and not only
2 discard it but not only use all the evidence and all the
3 information that I've giem over the last six years
4 against me.

5 Q And what do you mean when you are referring to all
6 the evidence and information you gave them over the last
7 six years?
8 A All of the fraud and -- all the frauds that I've
9 committed for years that I've giem and cooperated
10 with them with respect to this information.
11 Q Now, do you believe it's in your own self-interest to
12 lie as you sit here today?
13 MR. SCHOER: Objection.
14 MR. LEE: Objection.
15 THE COURT: Overruled.
16 MR. WHITE: You can answer.
17 A Could you just repeat that again, Mr. White?
18 Q As you sit here today, do you believe it is in your
19 own self-interest to be unlawful in your testimony today?
20 A I'm sorry?
21 THE COURT: If you don't understand the question,
22 say so.
23 THE WITNESS: Yes, please ask it again.
24 MR. WHITE: Let me try to rephrase it.
25 BY MR. WHITE:


OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7015
Zerring-redirect/White

1 Q Do you think it's in your self-interest to be
2 truthful or untruthful in your testimony today?
3 A To be absolutely truthful.
4 Q Why is it that you believe that's in your
5 self-interest?
6 A Because if I'm truthful and live up to my cooperation
7 agreement and give full cooperation, accurate information,
8 truthful, substantial information to the government, then
9 they will issue this -- their office will issue to the
10 Honorable Wexler a 5K letter which permits the Court to
11 depart from these guidelines to a minimum of zero time in
12 jail.
13 Q Now, the tape-recordings you made at Who's Who
14 Worldwide, did you turn them over to the government?
15 A Yes.
16 Q Did you turn over all the tapes you made to the
17 government?
18 A Absolutely.

19 Q Did you turn over all the tapes you made to the
20 government regardless of their content?
21 A Absolutely correct.
22 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, may I have one moment?
23 THE COURT: Yes.
24 (Counsel confer.)
25 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, I have no further
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7016
Zerring-recross/Nelson

1 questions.
2 THE COURT: Anything else?
3 MR. NELSON: Just briefly, Your Honor.
4 RECROSS EXAMINATION
5 BY MR. NELSON:
6 Q Mr. Zerring.
7 A Yes, sir.
8 Q Mr. White had asked you with respect to your boat
9 that you don't have it anymore. Did the government seek
10 to forfeit your boat?
11 A No.
12 Q Did the government seek to forfeit your Rolls Royce?
13 A No.
14 Q Did the government seek to forfeit your house?
15 A No.
16 Q And you have indicated that you are presently living
17 on savings and pension that you presently have; is that
18 correct?
19 A Not internally. To break that question down is --
20 Q Let's break it down.
21 A My savings is the IRA. I don't have any other
22 savings.
23 Q Would I be correct that the IRA are funds that you
24 acquired from a period of time from 1978 up to 1992?
25 A That would probably be accurate. I don't recall if I
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7017
Zerring-recross/Nelson

1 had IRAs prior to that when I was employed by another
2 public adjusting company.
3 Q And that public adjusting company you worked at
4 before 1978, you were also involved during that period of
5 time with defrauding insurance companies as well; is that
6 correct?
7 A Absolutely.
8 Q And did the government seek to forfeit your IRAs?

9 A No.
10 MR. NELSON: Thank you.
11 (Continued.)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7018
Zerring-redirect/White

1 REDIRECT EXAMINATION.
2 BY MR. WHITE:
3 Q Mr. Zerring, the money you still have -- let me back
4 up.
5 Can Judge Wexler, when he sentences you, require
6 you to make restitution?
7 A Absolutely.
8 Q If he does, will you pay the restitution out of the
9 funds you have now?
10 A I will make every attempt to. That's part of my
11 cooperation agreement, yes.
12 Q And are you liable for restitution of the millions of
13 dollars in fraud you have participated in?
14 A Absolutely.
15 MR. WHITE: I have no further questions.
16 THE COURT: Anything else?
17 MR. NELSON: Nothing.
18 THE COURT: You may step down.
19 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
20 THE COURT: Please call your next witness.
21 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, we have some tapes next.
22 Your Honor, this is Exhibit 13-06. The
23 transcript is 13-06-A. The date is October 24, 1994.
24 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide and Jill
25 Barnes, B-A-R-N-E-S.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7019
1 (Audiotape played.)
2 (Start and stop.)
3 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, the next one is Exhibit
4 13-27. The transcript is 13-27-A, as in Able. The date
5 is November 30, 1994.
6 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
7 salesperson is Laura white or Laura Winters.
8 (Audiotape played.)
9 (Start and stop.)
10 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, the next one is Exhibit
11 13-15. And the transcrip t is 13-15-A, like in Able. The
12 date is November 2, 1994.
13 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
14 salesperson is Shelly Posner, P-O-S-N-E-R.
15 (Audiotape played.)
16 (Stop and stop.)
17 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, next is 13-22. The
18 transcript is 13-22-A, like in Able. The date is November
19 7, 1994.
20 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide. The
21 salesperson is John Stevens, S-T-E-V-E-N-S.
22 (Audiotape played.)
23 (Start and stop.)
24 MR. WHITE: The next one is 13-23. The
25 transcript is 13-23-A, as in Able. The date is November
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7020
1 9, 1994.
2 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
3 salesperson is Michavel Maxes, M-A-X-E-S.
4 (Audiotape played.)
5 (Start and stop.)
6 MR. WHITE: Next is Exhibit 13-32. The
7 transcript is 13-32-A, as in Able. The date is December
8 15, 1994.
9 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
10 salesperson is Roseanne Patton.
11 (Audiotape played.)
12 (Start and stop.)
13 MR. WHITE: Next is Exhibit 13-35. The
14 transcript is 13-35-A, like in Able. The date is December
15 19, 1994.
16 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
17 salesperson is Mike Phillips, P-H-I-L-L-I-P-S.
18 (Audiotape played.)
19 (Start and stop.)
20 MR. WHITE: Next is Exhibit 13-46. The
21 transcript is 13-46-A, as in Able. The date is January
22 27, 1995.
23 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide. The
24 salesperson is Marilyn Pierce.
25 (Audiotape played.)
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7021
1 (Start and stop.)
2 MR. WHITE: Next is Exhibit 13-47. The
3 transcript is 13-47-A, like in Able. The date is January
4 30, 1995.
5 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
6 salesperson is Mark Johnson.
7 (Audiotape played.)
8 (Start and stop.)
9 MR. WHITE: Next is 13-55. The transcript is
10 13-55-A, like in Able. The date is December 2, 1994.
11 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
12 salesperson is Sam Christopher.
13 (Audiotape played.)
14 (Start and stop.)
15 MR. WHITE: Next, Your Honor, is Exhibit 13-57.
16 The transcript is 13-57-A, like in Able. The date is
17 December 12, 1994.
18 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
19 salesperson is Barbara McCabe, M-C-C-A-B-E.
20 (Audiotape played.)
21 (Start and stop.)
22 MR. WHITE: The next exhibit is 13-58. The
23 transcript is 13-58-A, like in Able. The date is December
24 14, 1994.
25 The call is to Sterling Who's Who. The
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7022
1 salesperson is Richard Maltz, M-A-L-T-Z.
2 (Audiotape played.)
3 (Start and stop.)
4 MR. WHITE: Next is Exhibit 13-67. The
5 transcript is 13-67-A, like in Able. The date is January
6 24, 1995.
7 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
8 salesperson is Scott Matthews.
9 THE COURT: That's not Scott Michavelson,
10 correct?
11 MR. WHITE: Scott Matthews at Sterling, who is
12 not Scott Michavelson, correct.
13 (Audiotape played.)
14 (Start and stop.)
15 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, the speed was off a
16 little but I think it was still intelligible.
17 THE COURT: All right.
18 MR. WHITE: May I just have a moment?
19 THE COURT: Yes.
20 MR. WHITE: The next one is Exhibit 13-70.
21 Transcript is 13-70-A, for Able. The date is January 31,
22 1995.
23 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
24 salesperson is Michavel Cain.
25 Let me see if I can adjust the speed before I
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7023
1 play it.
2 (Audiotape played.)
3 (Start and stop.)
4 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, the speed is varying a
5 little, Your Honor, but for the most part it is
6 intelligible. In other words, it's normal at one point
7 and then it speeds up and then it slows down a little
8 again. We'll try to adjust it.
9 (Audiotape played.)
10 (Start and stop.)
11 MR. WHITE: That was an unsuccessful excerpt.
12 THE COURT: That's not 13-70-A, according to my
13 transcript.
14 MR. WHITE: I'm sorry, I read the wrong one.
15 THE COURT: Do you want to start that over
16 again?
17 MR. WHITE: I think we'll do that. I'm sorry.
18 Let me start again so the record is clear.
19 This is 13-68. The transcript is 13-68-A, for
20 Able. The date is January 26, 1995.
21 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
22 salesperson is John Stevens. And this is the one where
23 the speed varies slightly but it is still intelligible.
24 (Audiotape played.)
25 (Start and stop.)
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7024
1 MR. WHITE: Now, the next one is 13-70. The
2 transcript is 13-70-A, as in Able. The date is January
3 31, 1995.
4 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
5 salesperson is Michavel Cain, C-A-I-N.
6 (Audiotape played.)
7 (Start and stop.)
8 MR. WHITE: The next is 13-72. The transcript is
9 13-72-A, like in Able. The date is February 8, 1995.
10 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
11 salesperson is Mike Phillips, P-H-I-L-L-I-P-S.
12 (Audi otape played.)
13 (Start and stop.)
14 MR. WHITE: Next is 13-75. The transcript is
15 13-75-A, for Able. The date is March 9, 1995.
16 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
17 salesperson is Bill Douglas, D-O-U-G-L-A-S.
18 (Audiotape played.)
19 (Start and stop.)
20 MR. WHITE: Next up is Exhibit 13-77. The
21 transcript is 13-77-A, for Able. The date is March 10,
22 1995.
23 The call is to Sterling Who's Who, and the
24 salesperson is Jim Reed, R-E-E-D.
25 (Audiotape played.)
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7025
1 (Start and stop.)
2 MR. WHITE: Next up is Exhibit 13-78. The
3 transcript is 13-78-A, for Able. The date is March 27,
4 1995.
5 It's a call to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
6 salesperson is Alan Saffer.
7 (Audiotape played.)
8 (Start and stop.)
9 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, the next one is Exhibit
10 13-08. The transcript is 13-08-A, for Able. This is a
11 full call, not just an excerpt. The date is October 27,
12 1994.
13 The call is to Who's Who Worldwide, and the
14 salesperson is Scott Michavelson.
15 (Audiotape played.)
16 (Start and stop).
17 MR. WHITE: This is Scott Michavelson, not Scott
18 Matthews.
19 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, I believe we've heard
20 this entire tape before, if I'm not mistaken.
21 MR. WHITE: I think it was referred to in
22 testimony but we haven't played it.
23 MR. TRABULUS: All right.
24 MR. WHITE: It was referred to in the
25 cross-examination. We didn't actually play it.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7026
1 (Audiotape played.)
2 (Start and stop.)
3 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, that's the extent of the
4 t apes we had cued up. We would have to switch recorders
5 and it would take us about ten minutes.
6 THE COURT: Do you have a witness in lieu of
7 waiting ten minutes?
8 MR. WHITE: No.
9 THE COURT: Somehow I didn't think you did.
10 MR. WHITE: And you're right.
11 THE COURT: So you want to recess for the
12 evening, then?
13 MR. WHITE: Yes, please. I mean, we'll set up
14 the tape.
15 THE COURT: It takes ten minutes to set up the
16 tape. We'll not wait ten minutes for you to do it.
17 MR. WHITE: All right.
18 THE COURT: All right. Members of the jury,
19 we'll recess until Monday. Monday is the 9th of March.
20 How time goes by.
21 In the meantime, please don't discuss the case
22 among yourselves or with anyone else. Keep an open mind.
23 Come to no conclusions.
24 Those of you who are employed, go to work. I'm
25 not direc ting you to go to work but that would be a good
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7027
1 idea, I think. People in your place of employment might
2 like to see you from time to time.
3 Have a very nice weekend and we'll see you at
4 9:30 on Monday, March 9th.
5 Have a nice weekend.
6 (Jury exits.)
7 THE COURT: How much more of these
8 tape-recordings do you have? I suspect you keep them for
9 times like this afternoon when you don't have a witness.
10 MR. WHITE: I've done that so we don't keep any
11 witnesses overnight when we don't have to.
12 THE COURT: Perfectly all right. How much more
13 of these tape-recordings will you have?
14 MR. WHITE: Not much, Your Honor. We are down to
15 the last small amount.
16 THE COURT: Who will be your witnesses on
17 Monday?
18 MR. WHITE: On Monday the possible wit ness are
19 Mr. Tardera, T-A-R-D-E-R-A. Mr. William Smith, and
20 Mr. Sainte, S-A-I-N-T-E.
21 THE COURT: That will last the entire day?
22 MR. WHITE: I hope so.
23 THE COURT: Well, it better. I want witnesses
24 here. Let them come back the next day. I don't want to
25 wait. I want to use all the time.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7028
1 MR. WHITE: I understand. We'll try to line up
2 additional people and if we have people lined up I'll try
3 to notify defense counsel about that.
4 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, I was just giving you
5 my estimate. Two of those people are members. I don't
6 think they will take very long in terms of cross and one
7 of the attorneys for Reed I'm not sure that will be long.
8 THE COURT: That doesn't sound like it will take
9 up the whole day. Better get two or three more witnesses

10 on Monday.
11 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, I'll try that. I'm glad
12 that Mr. Tardera will take that long. When Mr. Skalka
13 came it was three days.
14 MR. TRABULUS: I'm not sure, Your Honor.
15 THE COURT: Have some more witnesses available.
16 MR. WHITE: I'll try.
17 THE COURT: If they have to come back the next
18 day, so be it.
19 MS. SCOTT: Your Honor, may I just raise a boring
20 issue. Going back to that long list of exhibits Your
21 Honor admitted this morning, for the sake of clarity,
22 shall I give the list to Mr. Wicker to work into the trial
23 transcripts? Would that be helpful?
24 THE COURT: How will the defendants know what you
25 are doing?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7029
1 MS. SCOTT: I could mark it as an exhibit and
2 pass it around to them.
3 THE COURT: All right.

4 Do we have a motion on for 5 o'clock?
5 MR. TRABULUS: The order to show cause, Your
6 Honor.
7 THE COURT: That's for tomorrow.
8 MR. JENKS: No, that's for today. You told us
9 today.
10 MR. TRABULUS: You told us there was a motion to
11 quash the subpoena or Sandy Barnes.
12 THE COURT: I thought it was tomorrow. You're
13 right.
14 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, while we're on the topic
15 of Sandra Barnes, I thought it was last Thursday that it
16 was some of her testimony and other testimony from the
17 Reed v. Who's Who Worldwide case that Mr. Trabulus was
18 considering introducing in the defense case. I'm still
19 waiting to get copies of that material and the other
20 materials that the defense attorneys said they would be
21 using.
22 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, I think Mr. White has
23 a complete set of her testimony.
24 MR. WHITE: Why do you say that?
25 MR. TRABULUS: You don't.
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7030
1 MR. WHITE: Well, I'm asking you for it. I don't
2 know that I do. But I want to know what you want
3 introduced.
4 MR. TRABULUS: I thought from previous
5 discussions. I don't know if I'll introduce anything. If
6 there are things that she says she doesn't recall, I may
7 use testimony and utilize it.
8 MR. WHITE: If you expect to use it I expect a
9 copy as I asked from you last week and pretrial.
10 MR. TRABULUS: Hang on a second.
11 MR. WHITE: I don't know if I have everything and
12 I don't know what portions he wants to have introduced.
13 (Recess taken.)
14 THE CLERK: Criminal cause for Order to Show
15 Cause.
16 MR. BAILEY: Your Honor, I'm Thomas Bailey for
17 Reed Elsevier and Sandra Barnes who was serve d an against
18 subpoena for this matter.
19 THE COURT: I know who the other lawyers are
20 here. They are still here I suppose. What is the nature
21 of your application, Mr. Bailey?
22 MR. BAILEY: Twofold, Your Honor.
23 First of all, I apologize for holding up all the
24 counsel in the room for being late.
25 Secondly, Mr. Trabulus and I have spoken and
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7031
1 there is some hope we can work this out. The first issue
2 is Ms. Barnes' attending to a family emergency involving
3 her daughter who is being operated during the day in the
4 Phoenix area. The subpoena was returnable on Monday the
5 9th. She is planning on being there and looking after her
6 20 month old and five month old grandchild until the
7 19th. But I now understand from Mr. Trabulus and might
8 have been able to under stand earlier had I been able to
9 figure out how to get into her voice mail in her absence,
10 I was given instructions but I didn't do it, is that she
11 may be appearing towards the end of the defense case
12 anyway and we may be able to work out her availability.
13 She is not seeking to block her appearance inasmuch as to
14 accommodate the needs of her grandchildren and daughter.
15 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, if I may interject.
16 When the government -- when this was prepared, the
17 government gave a statement that it was ending today. I
18 made the subpoena returnable on Monday, March 9th. It
19 appears that the government's case will not end next week,
20 sometime the end of next week, and there apparently will
21 be other defense witnesses and Ms. Barnes could come
22 towards the end. So this might enable her to complete her
23 obligations to her family member who is sick and come
24 here.
25 THE COURT: So you want to put her on call then?
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7032
1 MR. TRABULUS: I think that's what we would
2 logically do, Your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Would she consent to be on call,
4 Mr. Bailey?
5 MR. BAILEY: I'm sure she would consent to
6 anything that would allow her to stay each day, one day
7 longer at a time in Arizona where she is.
8 THE COURT: Are you acting on her behalf?
9 MR. BAILEY: I have to, Your Honor, but I've been
10 unable to contact her because of her absence.
11 THE COURT: If you will give a statement in
12 writing to Mr. Trabulus that she is on call, then she will
13 be called, given notice prior to the time she is needed
14 and you just heard Mr. Trabulus say she will not have to
15 come in on March 9th or the entire week of the 9th.

16 MR. TRABULUS: So long as Your Honor has no
17 problem with that, Your Honor. I think the government --
18 THE COURT: I have no problem. What do I have
19 got to do with it? If the government's case ends on
20 Monday and all the defendants rest, then that's the end of
21 that. It's moot.
22 MR. TRABULUS: I wouldn't rest, Your Honor, but
23 Ms. Barnes wouldn't be there. That's my concern.
24 THE COURT: I cannot do anything. That's your
25 concern, not mine. If you are willing to put her on call
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7033
1 and she agrees to be on call, she has to be here within 24
2 hours or something like that.
3 MR. TRABULUS: I would agree to that under the
4 circumstances.
5 THE COURT: That seems to me to be the most
6 reasonably approach but you will, with authority, have to
7 commit her to that or else she will have to be here on
8 Monday, I suppose if she doesn't want to do that.
9 Was she personally served, Mr. Trabulus?
10 MR. TRABULUS: Yes.
11 THE COURT: Then she has to be here. Unless she
12 agrees to be on call and you, with authority, put on the
13 record in writing that she agrees to be on call, subject
14 to call.
15 MR. BAILEY: My only question, Your Honor, is the
16 ability for her to get someone to cover for the daughter,
17 two grandchildren and I'm not sure, 24 hours is quite long
18 enough for her. I didn't have that in mind. What I was
19 asking for was some relief to allow her to look after her
20 daughter.
21 THE COURT: Mr. Bailey, I'm very appreciative,
22 I'm sorry about her daughter. But she has been under
23 subpoena. She has been subpoenaed to be a witness in a
24 criminal trial and she will be here on Monday unless she

25 agrees to be subject to call. And I cannot concern myself
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7034
1 with her problems.
2 MR. BAILEY: Then I have no alternative, I will
3 arrange in writing with Mr. Trabulus.
4 THE COURT: Okay, if you do that she will be
5 subject to call. It looks like she will have another
6 week, at least. And since Mr. Trabulus was nice enough to
7 say he would call her at the end of the case, if they put
8 a case in, she has probably more than that. I don't know
9 what else we can do.
10 MR. BAILEY: That is sufficient, Your Honor. I
11 think that is the best under the circumstances.
12 THE COURT: Very well.
13 Anything else on that?
14 MR. BAILEY: The second half of the request had
15 to do with trying to cut down the scope, the document
16 request accompanying her subpoena which Reed has hono red
17 and looked through her offices for her and all of these
18 places which they might be. There are a lot of
19 documents. They are still piling up from our warehouse
20 and Reed's warehouse. One of the problems is there is no
21 time-frame on this. The documents at Reed that we found
22 from 1994 to 1998 are up-to-date, Your Honor.
23 THE COURT: Well, I think the lawyers for the
24 defense are very, very well acquainted with the facts of
25 this case. They know the strengths and weaknesses of the
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7035
1 government's case and their own positions so they ought to
2 be able to tell you precisely what they want.
3 MR. TRABULUS: I think we can cut that down a
4 lot. I think we can cut down the documents a lot.
5 THE COURT: Why don't you sit down with
6 Mr. Bailey, Mr. Jenks knows about it, Mr. Schoer, and
7 anybody else. I'm not excluding anyone. Mr. Nelson,
8 we'll include you, you are in the front. But anybody else
9 who wants to stay around and help. But I think they know
10 precisely, really, what they want and they will be able to
11 cut that down, I feel for sure. And since they are fair
12 and reasonable lawyers, you will have no problem.
13 Now, if you were dealing with Mr. White, that's
14 another matter.
15 I'm only kidding.
16 Put than that on the record.
17 MR. TRABULUS: Speaking of the record --
18 THE COURT: Ms. Scott, she is reasonable.
19 MR. TRABULUS: I'm handing Mr. White.
20 THE COURT: Put down on the record that I was
21 only kidding, Mr. White. He knows that he's done an
22 admirable job of supplying discovery and representing the
23 government here, because I think he has.
24 MR. TRABULUS: Your Honor, I'm going to han d
25 Mr. White such former testimony of Sandra Barnes as I have
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7036
1 in my position that in any way relates to it. So he has
2 it now.
3 THE COURT: You are delivering it in person right
4 now?
5 MR. TRABULUS: Right, because he raised this
6 before. There is testimony in the Reed Elsevier against
7 Who's Who Worldwide litigation, February 14th.
8 THE COURT: Slower.
9 MR. TRABULUS: It's testimony in the Reed
10 Elsevier against Who's Who Worldwide Registry, Inc.,
11 litigation, February 14, 1994, February 16, 1994, November
12 5, 1992, November 4, 1992.
13 THE COURT: Probably deposition.
14 MR. TRABULUS: There was a preliminary injunction
15 hearing in '92 and a trial in '94.
16 THE COURT: All right.
17 MR. WHITE: Mr. Trabulus and I discussed,
18 apparently, there are some other exhibits from this
19 litigation. He will try to give copies to someone else to
20 the U.S. Attorney's Office whom he will see tomorrow.
21 THE COURT: You mean Ms. Lum.
22 MR. TRABULUS: I think I have the extra set on
23 the record on appeal from that, the addendum and the
24 exhibits.
25 THE COURT: I have full confidence with you,
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7037
1 Mr. Trabulus, and if you don't have it, Mr. Schoer has it,
2 and if Mr. Schoer doesn't have it, Mr. Neville has it.
3 You didn't expect that one, did you?
4 MR. WALLENSTEIN: While we are on the record,
5 with respect to 3500 material I discussed with Mr. White
6 some 3500 material which I don't yet have in my possession
7 but which relates to the possible testimony of
8 Mr. Reffsin, that decision hadn't been made. In the
9 interes t of fairness if he does testify, Mr. Reffsin
10 testified at a trial, United States v. Evangelista.
11 THE COURT: Evangelista.
12 MR. WALLENSTEIN: -- Before Judge Wexler, I
13 believe, and at that time Mr. Reffsin testified as a
14 defense witness. Mr. White is aware of that. He will
15 search his files for the testimony. I'm going to do the
16 same and try to locate the testimony and one way or
17 another we'll both have sets of it.
18 THE COURT: Very well.
19 Anything else?
20 MR. BAILEY: No, Your Honor, just that I'll
21 volunteer. We should add, our warehouse of files complete
22 records from the trademark litigation that Mr. White and
23 Trabulus were referring to. If you end up short we'll
24 supply you with the copies.
25 THE COURT: I would suggest that you sit down
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7038


1 with defense counsel.
2 MR. WHITE: Your Honor, one other thing.
3 THE COURT: Yes.
4 MR. WHITE: There are a couple legal issues that
5 may come up next week that I want to work on, spend some
6 time on over the weekend which I might want to raise on
7 Monday morning.
8 Can we agree to be here like 9:20?
9 THE COURT: That's not enough time if you want to
10 raise legal issues. I think you ought to be here at
11 9 o'clock.
12 What are the legal issues, Mr. White?
13 MR. WHITE: Well, I wanted to do some research to
14 find out if I'm even going to --
15 THE COURT: Well, I suggest you tell us about
16 them on Monday and do the talking on Tuesday or Monday
17 afternoon.
18 MR. WHITE: Okay, I'll do that.
19 THE COURT: Then we'll see you at the regular
20 time, 9:30. Thank you.
21 (Proceedings adjourned.)
22
23

24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
7039
1 INDEX
2
3 R O L F I H L E N F E L D T...................... 6849
CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6849
4 CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6857
CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6878
5 CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6879
REDIRECT EXAMINATION................................. 6889
6 RECROSS EXAMINATION.................................. 6894
7 E L L I O T Z E R R I N G......................... 6906
DIRECT EXAMINATION................................... 6906
8 CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6933
9 M A D E L I N E L. W A L T O N................... 6951
DIRECT EXAMINATION................................... 6951
10 CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6960
REDIRECT EXAMINATION......................... ........ 6966
11 RECROSS-EXAMINATION.................................. 6968
12 E L L I O T Z E R R I N G.......................... 6970
CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 6970
13 CROSS-EXAMINATION.................................... 7007
REDIRECT EXAMINATION................................. 7008
14 RECROSS EXAMINATION.................................. 7016
REDIRECT EXAMINATION................................. 7018
15
16 EXHIBITS
17
Government's Exhibit 23-B received in evidence....... 7013
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
OWEN M. WICKER, RPR OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

Unholy Federal Trials  - The Illicit Smashing of Who's Who Worldwide Excecutive Club

The Who's Who Worldwide Tragedy has to count as being among the Stinkiest Trials In America.
For Reid Elsevier to have climbed so high up into bed with such 'vaunted' federal judges,
dispensing cash and favors with such profundity, tells sadly on all of us,
for tolerance of such high crimes is tantamount to participation.

Unholy Federal Trials  - The Illicit Smashing of Who's Who Worldwide Excecutive Club

(Reed Elsevier has been "pagewaxing" many Who's Who sites, which means illegally erasing them, so thanks for the mirror sites...)

Who's Who Mirror Site 1       Who's Who Mirror 2       Who's Who Mirror 3       Who's Who 4       Who's Who 5       Who's Who 6      

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. We have seen more four hundred state and federal judges
without exception, getting away with breaking the law. It is time for change; positive change.

Dirtiest Trials of the Twentieth Century
The Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy
Thomas FX Dunn again shows why he is the worst lawyer | worst attorney in America

Dirtiest trials of the 20th Century

There are now hundreds of huge websites with the full story of the Who's Who Worldwide Registry tragedy,
a necessary action because of the illicit and undeniably reprehensible actions of Reed Elsevier, Ltd.

Each "Dirtiest trials of the 20th Century" website contains more than 12,000 printable pages,
detailing how a handful of salespeople, each with a life and story all their own,
had everything taken from them by raw, base corruption in this great land.
Reed Elsevier, Ltd, and its hundreds and hundreds of subsidiaries,
is the richest, most powerful and influential publisher on earth.

Their corruption of those in government service is legendary.
This is just one of their vicious conquests among so many,
revealed in one of the Dirtiest trials of the 20th Century,
one of the dirtiest trials in federal history,
The Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy.
Call Congress, call the White House.
Demand a pardon for the Who's Who-ers.
Please.     Call today.

Dirtiest trials of the 20th Century

There are now hundreds of huge websites with the full story of the Who's Who Worldwide Registry tragedy,
detailing how a handful of salespeople, each with a life and story all their own,
had everything taken from them by raw, base corruption in this great land.
Reed Elsevier, Ltd, and its hundreds and hundreds of subsidiaries,
is the richest, most powerful and influential publisher on earth.

Their corruption of those in government service is legendary.
This is just one of their vicious conquests among so many,
revealed in one of the Dirtiest trials of the 20th Century,
one of the dirtiest trials in federal history,
The Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy.
Call Congress, call the White House.
Demand a pardon for the Who's Who-ers.
Please.     Call today.

Ludicrous Perversions of Justice in America     The Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy
Help the Who's Who-ers by calling the President at 202-456-1414     demanding that he pardon the Who's Who Six